mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Fano-Style Accuracy Upper Bound for LLM Single-Pass Reasoning in Multi-Hop QA

arXiv 2509.21199 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-Hop Question Answering (MHQA) requires integrating dispersed, interdependent evidence through sequential reasoning under noise. This task is challenging for LLMs as they have a finite per-pass output capacity, beyond which the integration of task-relevant evidence proves unreliable. Consequently, the single-pass reasoning paradigm is inherently vulnerable to this capacity overflow. To formalize this bottleneck, our analysis establishes a Fano-style accuracy upper bound, defining a theoretical performance ceiling for single-pass LLMs. This bound reveals that accuracy inevitably collapses once task complexity exceeds model capacity, providing general principles for capacity-aware representation and structuring of MHQA in LLMs. Building on these principles, we introduce a proof-of-concept multi-call framework for MHQA, InfoQA. It ensures high per-step accuracy by combining capacity-aware task decomposition with active pruning of prior reasoning traces, keeping the information load within the single-pass limit. It further achieves robustness by a dependency-explicit workflow that enables precise control over the reasoning path. We construct a stringent and noise-rich benchmark to validate our theory and framework. Experimental results show that model behavior aligns with our predicted capacity curves while InfoQA achieves consistent performance improvements. We hope our work inspires more LLM multi-step reasoning methods: faGithub hrefhttps://github.com/KaiyangWan/InfoQAInfoQA.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  8. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  9. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  10. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  11. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
  12. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
9 more
  1. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
  2. 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 384
  3. 2023An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Callingcited by 179
  4. 2024Assisting in Writing Wikipedia-like Articles From Scratch with Large Language Modelscited by 154
  5. 2024GLoRe: When, Where, and How to Improve LLM Reasoning via Global and Local Refinementscited by 103
  6. 2022Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 64
  7. 2023Did You Read the Instructions? Rethinking the Effectiveness of Task Definitions in Instruction Learningcited by 41
  8. 2024FIRE: Fact-checking with Iterative Retrieval and Verificationcited by 39
  9. 2025A Cognitive Writing Perspective for Constrained Long-Form Text Generationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Tail Knowledge
  2. 2026SAFE: An LLM-as-Verifier Framework for Evidence-Grounded Multi-Hop Reasoning
  3. 2023Furthest Reasoning with Plan Assessment: Stable Reasoning Path with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
  4. 2026Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models
  5. 2023PokeMQA: Programmable knowledge editing for Multi-hop Question Answering
  6. 2023Uncertainty Guided Global Memory Improves Multi-Hop Question Answering
  7. 2025Multi-granular Training Strategies for Robust Multi-hop Reasoning Over Noisy and Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources
  8. 2026PAR2-RAG: Planned Active Retrieval and Reasoning for Multi-Hop Question Answering