mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Quantitative Study of Sustained Focus in Large Language Models via Repetitive Deterministic Prediction Tasks

arXiv 2511.00763 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the performance of large language models (LLMs) on repetitive deterministic prediction tasks and study how the sequence accuracy rate (SAR) scales with output length. Each such task involves the repetition of the same operation N times. Examples of such tasks include letter replacement in letter strings following a given rule, integer addition, and multiplication of string operators in many-body quantum mechanics. If the LLM performs the task by a simple repetition algorithm, the success rate would follow an exponential decay with sequence length. In contrast, our experiments on leading LLMs reveal a crossover that is sharper than exponential: -logSAR grows super-linearly with N, and accuracy collapses around a characteristic length N_*, the accuracy cliff that separates reliable from unreliable generation. The hypothesis of independent per-step errors is rejected for every model and task we studied. The crossover is well described by a double-exponential accumulation law, SAR=exp(-β0 NαN-1), whose crossover scale N_* does not depend on the functional form chosen to fit it. To interpret this behaviour we introduce a minimal effective model in which step-correctness variables interact through dense random couplings and compete with an external field set by the prompt. Solved by direct enumeration, the model reproduces the super-linear error accumulation and the accuracy cliff qualitatively, and it assigns to each model--task pair two interpretable parameters, an intrinsic error rate and an error-accumulation factor.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2025.

Builds on

20 of 25 references.

References · 20

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  7. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  8. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  9. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  10. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
  11. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  12. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
8 more
  1. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
  2. 2023An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Callingcited by 179
  3. 2023Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solvecited by 178
  4. 2024GLoRe: When, Where, and How to Improve LLM Reasoning via Global and Local Refinementscited by 103
  5. 2024FIRE: Fact-checking with Iterative Retrieval and Verificationcited by 39
  6. 2024Consistency-diversity-realism Pareto fronts of conditional image generative modelscited by 36
  7. 2025A Cognitive Writing Perspective for Constrained Long-Form Text Generationcited by 14
  8. 2025A Fano-Style Accuracy Upper Bound for LLM Single-Pass Reasoning in Multi-Hop QAcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.