The Unwinnable Arms Race of AI Image Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid progress of image generative AI has blurred the boundary between synthetic and real images, fueling an arms race between generators and discriminators. This paper investigates the conditions under which discriminators are most disadvantaged in this competition. We analyze two key factors: data dimensionality and data complexity. While increased dimensionality often strengthens the discriminators ability to detect subtle inconsistencies, complexity introduces a more nuanced effect. Using Kolmogorov complexity as a measure of intrinsic dataset structure, we show that both very simple and highly complex datasets reduce the detectability of synthetic images; generators can learn simple datasets almost perfectly, whereas extreme diversity masks imperfections. In contrast, intermediate-complexity datasets create the most favorable conditions for detection, as generators fail to fully capture the distribution and their errors remain visible.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
32 of 57 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 390
20 more
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 321
- 2024Guiding a Diffusion Model with a Bad Version of Itselfcited by 299
- 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 283
- 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
- 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 213
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2024A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 189
- 2021Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-artcited by 139
- 2019Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matricescited by 124
- 2024Eliminating Oversaturation and Artifacts of High Guidance Scales in Diffusion Modelscited by 114
- 2023CIFAKE: Image Classification and Explainable Identification of AI-Generated Synthetic Imagescited by 84
- 2023Seeing is not always believing: Benchmarking Human and Model Perception of AI-Generated Imagescited by 66
- 2021Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowdscited by 58
- 2024A Single Simple Patch is All You Need for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 44
- 2025CO-SPY: Combining Semantic and Pixel Features to Detect Synthetic Images by AIcited by 42
- 2025Methods and Trends in Detecting AI-Generated Images: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 12
- 2025How good are humans at detecting AI-generated images? Learnings from an experimentcited by 7
- 2019Fake News, Disinformation, and Deepfakes: Leveraging Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain to Combat Digital Deception and Counterfeit Realitycited by 6
- 2023Detecting and Restoring Non-Standard Hands in Stable Diffusion Generated Imagescited by 3
- 2024Behind the Deepfake: 8% Create; 90% Concerned. Surveying public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes in the UKcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.