Binary Autoencoder for Mechanistic Interpretability of Large Language Models
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing works are dedicated to untangling atomized numerical components (features) from the hidden states of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, they typically rely on autoencoders constrained by some training-time regularization on single training instances, without an explicit guarantee of global sparsity among instances, causing a large amount of dense (simultaneously inactive) features, harming the feature sparsity and atomization. In this paper, we propose a novel autoencoder variant that enforces minimal entropy on minibatches of hidden activations, thereby promoting feature independence and sparsity across instances. For efficient entropy calculation, we discretize the hidden activations to 1-bit via a step function and apply gradient estimation to enable backpropagation, so that we term it as Binary Autoencoder (BAE) and empirically demonstrate two major applications: (1) Feature set entropy calculation. Entropy can be reliably estimated on binary hidden activations, which can be leveraged to characterize the inference dynamics of LLMs. (2) Feature untangling. Compared to typical methods, due to improved training strategy, BAE avoids dense features while producing the largest number of interpretable ones among baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 61 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
61 of 89 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Dense SAE Latents Are Features, Not Bugs18 Jun
- 2025Route Sparse Autoencoder to Interpret Large Language Models11 Mar
- 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models7 Mar
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders9 Dec
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders19 Jul
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders6 Jun
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders24 Apr
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep
Other references · 53
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,346
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
- 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,043
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
38 more
- 2016XNOR-Net: ImageNet Classification Using Binary Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 849
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2016DoReFa-Net: Training Low Bitwidth Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Bitwidth Gradientscited by 569
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 549
- 2018PACT: Parameterized Clipping Activation for Quantized Neural Networkscited by 467
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 312
- 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 284
- 2023A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Modelscited by 256
- 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 255
- 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 236
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 235
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
- 2020Binary Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 190
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
- 2021The Low-Rank Simplicity Bias in Deep Networkscited by 154
- 2019Quantization Networkscited by 153
- 2023What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learningcited by 152
- 2024Make Your LLM Fully Utilize the Contextcited by 119
- 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?cited by 93
- 2023Mitigating Label Biases for In-context Learningcited by 89
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structurescited by 83
- 2024Anisotropy Is Inherent to Self-Attention in Transformerscited by 63
- 2025The Origins of Representation Manifolds in Large Language Modelscited by 51
- 2024Fantastic Semantics and Where to Find Them: Investigating Which Layers of Generative LLMs Reflect Lexical Semanticscited by 44
- 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 43
- 2024Why Do Large Language Models (LLMs) Struggle to Count Letters?cited by 38
- 2024Mathematical Models of Computation in Superpositioncited by 35
- 2023Never Lost in the Middle: Mastering Long-Context Question Answering with Position-Agnostic Decompositional Trainingcited by 32
- 2025MUDDFormer: Breaking Residual Bottlenecks in Transformers via Multiway Dynamic Dense Connectionscited by 31
- 2024Can In-context Learning Really Generalize to Out-of-distribution Tasks?cited by 23
- 2024Can LLMs Solve longer Math Word Problems Better?cited by 22
- 2024Revisiting In-context Learning Inference Circuit in Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2024What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesiscited by 13
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AdaptiveK: Complexity-Driven Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Language Model Representations
- 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations
- 2025Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability
- 2025Binary Sparse Coding for Interpretability
- 2025Sparse-Autoencoder-Guided Internal Representation Unlearning for Large Language Models
- 2025AbsTopK: Rethinking Sparse Autoencoders For Bidirectional Features
- 2025Low-Rank Adapting Models for Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Binary Neural Networks for Large Language Model: A Survey