mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MDBench: Benchmarking Data-Driven Methods for Model Discovery

arXiv 2509.20529 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model discovery aims to uncover governing differential equations of dynamical systems directly from experimental data. Benchmarking such methods is essential for tracking progress and understanding trade-offs in the field. While prior efforts have focused mostly on identifying single equations, typically framed as symbolic regression, there remains a lack of comprehensive benchmarks for discovering dynamical models. To address this, we introduce MDBench, an open-source benchmarking framework for evaluating model discovery methods on dynamical systems. MDBench assesses 12 algorithms on 14 partial differential equations (PDEs) and 63 ordinary differential equations (ODEs) under varying levels of noise. Evaluation metrics include derivative prediction accuracy, model complexity, and equation fidelity. We also introduce seven challenging PDE systems from fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, revealing key limitations in current methods. Our findings illustrate that linear methods and genetic programming methods achieve the lowest prediction error for PDEs and ODEs, respectively. Moreover, linear models are in general more robust against noise. MDBench accelerates the advancement of model discovery methods by offering a rigorous, extensible benchmarking framework and a rich, diverse collection of dynamical system datasets, enabling systematic evaluation, comparison, and improvement of equation accuracy and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

22 of 58 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  4. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 413
  5. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
  6. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
  7. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
  8. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
  9. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 156
  10. 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 155
  11. 2023Language Model Crossover: Variation through Few-Shot Promptingcited by 122
  12. 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 110
10 more
  1. 2019Integration of Neural Network-Based Symbolic Regression in Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 93
  2. 2021Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modellingcited by 88
  3. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
  4. 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 71
  5. 2023ODEFormer: Symbolic Regression of Dynamical Systems with Transformerscited by 62
  6. 2023CFDBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Machine Learning Methods in Fluid Dynamicscited by 46
  7. 2024In-Context Symbolic Regression: Leveraging Large Language Models for Function Discoverycited by 31
  8. 2021An Extensible Benchmark Suite for Learning to Simulate Physical Systemscited by 24
  9. 2023A Bayesian Framework for learning governing Partial Differential Equation from Datacited by 8
  10. 2022A Bayesian Approach for Spatio-Temporal Data-Driven Dynamic Equation Discoverycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.