Human-AI Narrative Synthesis to Foster Shared Understanding in Civic Decision-Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Community engagement processes in representative political contexts, like school districts, generate massive volumes of feedback that overwhelm traditional synthesis methods, creating barriers to shared understanding not only between civic leaders and constituents but also among community members. To address these barriers, we developed StoryBuilder, a human-AI collaborative pipeline that transforms community input into accessible first-person narratives. Using 2,480 community responses from an ongoing school rezoning process, we generated 124 composite stories and deployed them through a mobile-friendly StorySharer interface. Our mixed-methods evaluation combined a four-month field deployment, user studies with 21 community members, and a controlled experiment examining how narrative composition affects participant reactions. Field results demonstrate that narratives helped community members relate across diverse perspectives. In the experiment, experience-grounded narratives generated greater respect and trust than opinion-heavy narratives. We contribute a human-AI narrative synthesis system and insights on its varied acceptance and effectiveness in a real-world civic context.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 147 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.
Builds on
37 of 147 references.
References · 37
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 232
- 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 229
- 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
- 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
- 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 147
- 2022Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Modelscited by 115
- 2024ReDeEP: Detecting Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 100
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 86
25 more
- 2024Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooMcited by 77
- 2023The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytellingcited by 58
- 2022Do People Engage Cognitively with AI? Impact of AI Assistance on Incidental Learningcited by 53
- 2023Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness -- Except When They Are Convincingly Wrongcited by 51
- 2023Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Poliscited by 41
- 2024Training Language Models to Generate Text with Citations via Fine-grained Rewardscited by 40
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for Learning Complex Legal Concepts through Storytellingcited by 23
- 2021GraphPlan: Story Generation by Planning with Event Graphcited by 18
- 2023Redefining Qualitative Analysis in the AI Era: Utilizing ChatGPT for Efficient Thematic Analysiscited by 15
- 2023Where Are We So Far? Understanding Data Storytelling Tools from the Perspective of Human-AI Collaborationcited by 13
- 2023QualiGPT: GPT as an easy-to-use tool for qualitative codingcited by 8
- 2025ScholarMate: A Mixed-Initiative Tool for Qualitative Knowledge Work and Information Sensemakingcited by 7
- 2025Attribution, Citation, and Quotation: A Survey of Evidence-based Text Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2024Studying Up Public Sector AI: How Networks of Power Relations Shape Agency Decisions Around AI Design and Usecited by 6
- 2023FeedbackMap: a tool for making sense of open-ended survey responsescited by 4
- 2023On the Automatic Generation and Simplification of Children's Storiescited by 4
- 2020CommunityClick: Capturing and Reporting Community Feedback from Town Halls to Improve Inclusivitycited by 3
- 2024Bridging Dictionary: AI-Generated Dictionary of Partisan Language Usecited by 3
- 2024Thoughtful Adoption of NLP for Civic Participation: Understanding Differences Among Policymakerscited by 3
- 2024From Fake Perfects to Conversational Imperfects: Exploring Image-Generative AI as a Boundary Object for Participatory Design of Public Spacescited by 3
- 2023StoryChat: Designing a Narrative-Based Viewer Participation Tool for Live Streaming Chatroomscited by 2
- 2025BoundarEase: Fostering Constructive Community Engagement to Inform More Equitable Student Assignment Policiescited by 2
- 2024DanModCap: Designing a Danmaku Moderation Tool for Video-Sharing Platforms that Leverages Impact Captions with Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025Voice to Vision: Enhancing Civic Decision-Making through Co-Designed Data Infrastructurecited by 1
- 2025What Makes AI Applications Acceptable or Unacceptable? A Predictive Moral Frameworkcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.