mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Language Translation Models by Playing Telephone

arXiv 2509.19611 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Our ability to efficiently and accurately evaluate the quality of machine translation systems has been outrun by the effectiveness of current language models--which limits the potential for further improving these models on more challenging tasks like long-form and literary translation. We propose an unsupervised method to generate training data for translation evaluation over different document lengths and application domains by repeated rounds of translation between source and target languages. We evaluate evaluation systems trained on texts mechanically generated using both model rotation and language translation approaches, demonstrating improved performance over a popular translation evaluation system (xCOMET) on two different tasks: (i) scoring the quality of a given translation against a human reference and (ii) selecting which of two translations is generationally closer to an original source document.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 37 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  3. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  5. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
  6. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  7. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
  8. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
  9. 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 341
  10. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  11. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  12. 2020InfoXLM: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Cross-Lingual Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 237
8 more
  1. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
  2. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  3. 2021XTREME-R: Towards More Challenging and Nuanced Multilingual Evaluationcited by 168
  4. 2023Ties Matter: Meta-Evaluating Modern Metrics with Pairwise Accuracy and Tie Calibrationcited by 74
  5. 2024Improving Statistical Significance in Human Evaluation of Automatic Metrics via Soft Pairwise Accuracycited by 25
  6. 2024Can Automatic Metrics Assess High-Quality Translations?cited by 16
  7. 2021Quality Estimation without Human-labeled Datacited by 15
  8. 2019Semantic Drift in Multilingual Representationscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.