mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Identifying and Addressing User-level Security Concerns in Smart Homes Using "Smaller" LLMs

arXiv 2509.19485 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid growth of smart home IoT devices, users are increasingly exposed to various security risks, as evident from recent studies. While seeking answers to know more on those security concerns, users are mostly left with their own discretion while going through various sources, such as online blogs and technical manuals, which may render higher complexity to regular users trying to extract the necessary information. This requirement does not go along with the common mindsets of smart home users and hence threatens the security of smart homes furthermore. In this paper, we aim to identify and address the major user-level security concerns in smart homes. Specifically, we develop a novel dataset of Q&A from public forums, capturing practical security challenges faced by smart home users. We extract major security concerns in smart homes from our dataset by leveraging the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). We fine-tune relatively "smaller" transformer models, such as T5 and Flan-T5, on this dataset to build a QA system tailored for smart home security. Unlike larger models like GPT and Gemini, which are powerful but often resource hungry and require data sharing, smaller models are more feasible for deployment in resource-constrained or privacy-sensitive environments like smart homes. The dataset is manually curated and supplemented with synthetic data to explore its potential impact on model performance. This approach significantly improves the system's ability to deliver accurate and relevant answers, helping users address common security concerns with smart home IoT devices. Our experiments on real-world user concerns show that our work improves the performance of the base models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 52 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  3. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  4. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  5. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
  6. 2019JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Datasetcited by 116
  7. 2024CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 62
  8. 2022SecureBERT: A Domain-Specific Language Model for Cybersecuritycited by 60
  9. 2023Large Language Models for Code Analysis: Do LLMs Really Do Their Job?cited by 45
  10. 2020Template-Based Question Generation from Retrieved Sentences for Improved Unsupervised Question Answeringcited by 39
  11. 2023SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Securitycited by 37
  12. 2024Tiny Titans: Can Smaller Large Language Models Punch Above Their Weight in the Real World for Meeting Summarization?cited by 33
3 more
  1. 2022CHQ-Summ: A Dataset for Consumer Healthcare Question Summarizationcited by 11
  2. 2024Effective Context Selection in LLM-based Leaderboard Generation: An Empirical Studycited by 6
  3. 2025ChatIoT: Large Language Model-based Security Assistant for Internet of Things with Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.