Effective Context Selection in LLM-based Leaderboard Generation: An Empirical Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper explores the impact of context selection on the efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating Artificial Intelligence (AI) research leaderboards, a task defined as the extraction of (Task, Dataset, Metric, Score) quadruples from scholarly articles. By framing this challenge as a text generation objective and employing instruction finetuning with the FLAN-T5 collection, we introduce a novel method that surpasses traditional Natural Language Inference (NLI) approaches in adapting to new developments without a predefined taxonomy. Through experimentation with three distinct context types of varying selectivity and length, our study demonstrates the importance of effective context selection in enhancing LLM accuracy and reducing hallucinations, providing a new pathway for the reliable and efficient generation of AI leaderboards. This contribution not only advances the state of the art in leaderboard generation but also sheds light on strategies to mitigate common challenges in LLM-based information extraction.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.
Builds on
9 of 13 references.
References · 9
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
- 2020Growth rates of modern science: A latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databasescited by 75
- 2020AxCell: Automatic Extraction of Results from Machine Learning Paperscited by 48
- 2021Automated Mining of Leaderboards for Empirical AI Researchcited by 16
- 2023Zero-shot Entailment of Leaderboards for Empirical AI Researchcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025MedPAIR: Measuring Physicians and AI Relevance Alignment in Medical Question Answeringcited by 5
- 2025A Position Paper on the Automatic Generation of Machine Learning Leaderboardscited by 3
- 2025NoteEx: Interactive Visual Context Manipulation for LLM-Assisted Exploratory Data Analysis in Computational Notebookscited by 2
- 2025Identifying and Addressing User-level Security Concerns in Smart Homes Using "Smaller" LLMscited by 0
- 2026MetaLead: A Comprehensive Human-Curated Leaderboard Dataset for Transparent Reporting of Machine Learning Experimentscited by 0
- 2026Diagnosing Structural Failures in LLM-Based Evidence Extraction for Meta-Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Diagnosing Structural Failures in LLM-Based Evidence Extraction for Meta-Analysis11 Feb 2026
- 2026MetaLead: A Comprehensive Human-Curated Leaderboard Dataset for Transparent Reporting of Machine Learning Experiments30 Jan 2026
- 2025NoteEx: Interactive Visual Context Manipulation for LLM-Assisted Exploratory Data Analysis in Computational Notebooks10 Nov 2025
- 2025Identifying and Addressing User-level Security Concerns in Smart Homes Using "Smaller" LLMs23 Sep 2025
- 2025MedPAIR: Measuring Physicians and AI Relevance Alignment in Medical Question Answering29 May 2025
- 2025A Position Paper on the Automatic Generation of Machine Learning Leaderboards23 May 2025