mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Validation Strategy for Deep Learning Models: Evaluating and Enhancing Robustness

arXiv 2509.19197 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven models, especially deep learning classifiers often demonstrate great success on clean datasets. Yet, they remain vulnerable to common data distortions such as adversarial and common corruption perturbations. These perturbations can significantly degrade performance, thereby challenging the overall reliability of the models. Traditional robustness validation typically relies on perturbed test datasets to assess and improve model performance. In our framework, however, we propose a validation approach that extracts "weak robust" samples directly from the training dataset via local robustness analysis. These samples, being the most susceptible to perturbations, serve as an early and sensitive indicator of the model's vulnerabilities. By evaluating models on these challenging training instances, we gain a more nuanced understanding of its robustness, which informs targeted performance enhancement. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on models trained with CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet, highlighting how robustness validation guided by weak robust samples can drive meaningful improvements in model reliability under adversarial and common corruption scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

Builds on

28 of 51 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  7. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  8. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  9. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  10. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  11. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,301
  12. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,228
16 more
  1. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  2. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
  3. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
  4. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  5. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
  6. 2021Exploring Architectural Ingredients of Adversarially Robust Deep Neural Networkscited by 74
  7. 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71
  8. 2021A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustnesscited by 42
  9. 2024Threats, Attacks, and Defenses in Machine Unlearning: A Surveycited by 39
  10. 2021Improving robustness against common corruptions with frequency biased modelscited by 34
  11. 2021Defending Against Image Corruptions Through Adversarial Augmentationscited by 28
  12. 2023Out-of-Domain Robustness via Targeted Augmentationscited by 24
  13. 2019Invariance-inducing regularization using worst-case transformations suffices to boost accuracy and spatial robustnesscited by 18
  14. 2024Towards Robust Out-of-Distribution Generalization Bounds via Sharpnesscited by 11
  15. 2021RoMA: a Method for Neural Network Robustness Measurement and Assessmentcited by 10
  16. 2024Detecting Brittle Decisions for Free: Leveraging Margin Consistency in Deep Robust Classifierscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.