Confidence-Gated Vision-Only Heading Alignment for UAV-UGV Cooperative Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-based heading prediction is useful for UAV--UGV cooperation, but accurate prediction alone does not guarantee that every predicted heading should be issued directly as a control command. This paper investigates the decision problem of when and how a fixed vision-based heading predictor should be trusted for command issuance. A lightweight confidence-gated framework is proposed in which execution decisions are made using two interpretable reliability proxies derived from the perception stream: bounding-box area as a visibility-related proxy and short-window variation in predicted heading as a stability-related proxy. During low-confidence intervals, the framework compares the baseline freeze-HOLD policy with a bounded-blend fallback that updates the issued command conservatively. The method is evaluated on a real UAV--UGV dataset under clean and perturbed conditions. The results show that confidence gating creates a clear trade-off among execution rate, executed-frame accuracy, issued-command accuracy, and smoothness. The results further show that sparse execution can cause severe stale-command error under the baseline freeze-HOLD policy, whereas the bounded-blend fallback substantially improves command-level behavior under the same gate decisions. These findings highlight that reliable perception-driven autonomy depends not only on prediction accuracy, but also on decision-aware command issuance during low-confidence
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.
Builds on
16 of 41 references.
References · 16
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
- 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 333
- 2018Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 54
- 2019Leveraging Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Selective Classificationcited by 4
- 2021Visual Servoing Approach for Autonomous UAV Landing on a Moving Vehiclecited by 4
- 2025An Experimental Study of Trojan Vulnerabilities in UAV Autonomous Landingcited by 3
4 more
- 2025Visual Heading Prediction for Autonomous Aerial Vehiclescited by 2
- 2026Evolutionary Biparty Multiobjective UAV Path Planning: Problems and Empirical Comparisonscited by 2
- 2019Autonomous UAV Landing System Based on Visual Navigationcited by 1
- 2025A Validation Strategy for Deep Learning Models: Evaluating and Enhancing Robustnesscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.