Dissecting Federated-Graph Aggregation under Domain Shift: Importance-Aware Aggregation via Empirical Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated graph learning (FGL) trains a shared graph model across clients whose local graphs differ in node features, labels, and connectivity while keeping raw graph data decentralized. Although graph-domain shifts across clients can severely degrade the global model, existing FGL approaches for graph-domain shift mainly adapt local representations, propagation, or graph-derived collaboration, while the server typically applies the same aggregation rule to every parameter coordinate. In this work, we analyze how graph-domain shifts affect server-side aggregation. We find that, as clients optimize under distinct graph-domain conditions, they gradually concentrate their strongest updates on different parameter coordinates, making important update coordinates less shared across clients. Consequently, standard averaging can weaken these domain-specific signals even when client updates are not directly opposed. These findings reveal an aggregationinduced signal dilution effect: parameter coordinates strongly expressed by only a subset of domains are attenuated by nearzero contributions from the remaining domains. Motivated by these findings, we propose FedIA, a lightweight serverside aggregation method that calibrates parameter selection and client weighting. FedIA identifies important coordinates =within each layer and adjusts client aggregation weights according to their contributions on the selected subspace, without modifying local graph training or the standard clientupdate payload. Experiments on Twitch Gamers and WikiNet using two graph-learning backbones and nine FL/FGL baselines show improvements of up to 11.58 percentage points, with particularly strong gains under domain skew.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.
Builds on
18 of 26 references.
References · 18
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
- 2021FedProto: Federated Prototype Learning across Heterogeneous Clientscited by 352
- 2021Subgraph Federated Learning with Missing Neighbor Generationcited by 132
- 2024FedGTA: Topology-aware Averaging for Federated Graph Learningcited by 44
- 2022Graph Neural Networks are Inherently Good Generalizers: Insights by Bridging GNNs and MLPscited by 42
- 2021FedGraph: Federated Graph Learning with Intelligent Samplingcited by 34
- 2024Fair Federated Learning under Domain Skew with Local Consistency and Domain Diversitycited by 30
- 2024Federated Graph Semantic and Structural Learningcited by 30
6 more
- 2025FedAWA: Adaptive Optimization of Aggregation Weights in Federated Learning Using Client Vectorscited by 19
- 2024OpenFGL: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Federated Graph Learningcited by 16
- 2024FedSSP: Federated Graph Learning with Spectral Knowledge and Personalized Preferencecited by 16
- 2024Federated Graph Learning with Structure Proxy Alignmentcited by 14
- 2025A Comprehensive Data-centric Overview of Federated Graph Learningcited by 7
- 2025GRAIN: Exact Graph Reconstruction from Gradientscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.