Data Valuation and Selection in a Federated Model Marketplace
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the era of Artificial Intelligence (AI), marketplaces have become essential platforms for facilitating the exchange of data products to foster data sharing. Model transactions provide economic solutions in data marketplaces that enhance data reusability and ensure the traceability of data ownership. To establish trustworthy data marketplaces, Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm to enable collaborative learning across siloed datasets while safeguarding data privacy. However, effective data valuation and selection from heterogeneous sources in the FL setup remain key challenges. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework centered on a Wasserstein-based estimator tailored for FL. The estimator not only predicts model performance across unseen data combinations but also reveals the compatibility between data heterogeneity and FL aggregation algorithms. To ensure privacy, we propose a distributed method to approximate Wasserstein distance without requiring access to raw data. Furthermore, we demonstrate that model performance can be reliably extrapolated under the neural scaling law, enabling effective data selection without full-scale training. Extensive experiments across diverse scenarios, such as label skew, mislabeled, and unlabeled sources, show that our approach consistently identifies high-performing data combinations, paving the way for more reliable FL-based model marketplaces.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.
Builds on
27 of 41 references.
References · 27
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
- 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
- 2019Agnostic Federated Learningcited by 456
- 2018Statistical Aspects of Wasserstein Distancescited by 203
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
15 more
- 2019Efficient Task-Specific Data Valuation for Nearest Neighbor Algorithmscited by 148
- 2016Theoretical Analysis of Domain Adaptation with Optimal Transportcited by 105
- 2020Robust Federated Learning: The Case of Affine Distribution Shiftscited by 102
- 2018A Marketplace for Data: An Algorithmic Solutioncited by 76
- 2023LAVA: Data Valuation without Pre-Specified Learning Algorithmscited by 69
- 2018Model-based Pricing for Machine Learning in a Data Marketplacecited by 37
- 2017Learning Wasserstein Embeddingscited by 26
- 2023Data Valuation and Detections in Federated Learningcited by 17
- 2023Performance Scaling via Optimal Transport: Enabling Data Selection from Partially Revealed Sourcescited by 16
- 2024FedImpro: Measuring and Improving Client Update in Federated Learningcited by 15
- 2022An Optimal Transport Approach to Personalized Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2021FL-Market: Trading Private Models in Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2022On the Generalization of Wasserstein Robust Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2023Federated Wasserstein Distancecited by 8
- 2024Wasserstein Markets for Differentially-Private Datacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.