mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stabilizing Information Flow Entropy: Regularization for Safe and Interpretable Autonomous Driving Perception

arXiv 2509.16277 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep perception networks in autonomous driving traditionally rely on data-intensive training regimes and post-hoc anomaly detection, often disregarding fundamental information-theoretic constraints governing stable information processing. We reconceptualize deep neural encoders as hierarchical communication chains that incrementally compress raw sensory inputs into task-relevant latent features. Within this framework, we establish two theoretically justified design principles for robust perception: (D1) smooth variation of mutual information between consecutive layers, and (D2) monotonic decay of latent entropy with network depth. Our analysis shows that, under realistic architectural assumptions, particularly blocks comprising repeated layers of similar capacity, enforcing smooth information flow (D1) naturally encourages entropy decay (D2), thus ensuring stable compression. Guided by these insights, we propose Eloss, a novel entropy-based regularizer designed as a lightweight, plug-and-play training objective. Rather than marginal accuracy improvements, this approach represents a conceptual shift: it unifies information-theoretic stability with standard perception tasks, enabling explicit, principled detection of anomalous sensor inputs through entropy deviations. Experimental validation on large-scale 3D object detection benchmarks (KITTI and nuScenes) demonstrates that incorporating Eloss consistently achieves competitive or improved accuracy while dramatically enhancing sensitivity to anomalies, amplifying distribution-shift signals by up to two orders of magnitude. This stable information-compression perspective not only improves interpretability but also establishes a solid theoretical foundation for safer, more robust autonomous driving perception systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.

Builds on

10 of 28 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  2. 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 425
  3. 2019DeepJSCC-f: Deep Joint Source-Channel Coding of Images with Feedbackcited by 96
  4. 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
  5. 2021On the Practicality of Deterministic Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 62
  6. 2022Multi-modal Graph Learning for Disease Predictioncited by 34
  7. 2019Achieving Robustness to Aleatoric Uncertainty with Heteroscedastic Bayesian Optimisationcited by 11
  8. 2019Deep Joint Source-Channel Coding for Wireless Image Retrievalcited by 11
  9. 2021On the Robustness of Monte Carlo Dropout Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 11
  10. 2021A novel multimodal fusion network based on a joint coding model for lane line segmentationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.