mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Robustness of Monte Carlo Dropout Trained with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2103.12002 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The memorization effect of deep learning hinders its performance to effectively generalize on test set when learning with noisy labels. Prior study has discovered that epistemic uncertainty techniques are robust when trained with noisy labels compared with neural networks without uncertainty estimation. They obtain prolonged memorization effect and better generalization performance under the adversarial setting of noisy labels. Due to its superior performance amongst other selected epistemic uncertainty methods under noisy labels, we focus on Monte Carlo Dropout (MCDropout) and investigate why it is robust when trained with noisy labels. Through empirical studies on datasets MNIST, CIFAR-10, Animal-10n, we deep dive into three aspects of MCDropout under noisy label setting: 1. efficacy: understanding the learning behavior and test accuracy of MCDropout when training set contains artificially generated or naturally embedded label noise; 2. representation volatility: studying the responsiveness of neurons by examining the mean and standard deviation on each neuron's activation; 3. network sparsity: investigating the network support of MCDropout in comparison with deterministic neural networks. Our findings suggest that MCDropout further sparsifies and regularizes the deterministic neural networks and thus provides higher robustness against noisy labels.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2021.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  6. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  7. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  8. 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 521
  9. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  10. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
  11. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  12. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
11 more
  1. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  2. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  3. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  4. 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
  5. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  6. 2016Training Sparse Neural Networkscited by 73
  7. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  8. 2018A Semi-Supervised Two-Stage Approach to Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 29
  9. 2020Label Noise Types and Their Effects on Deep Learningcited by 29
  10. 2019Uncertainty Based Detection and Relabeling of Noisy Image Labelscited by 10
  11. 2020Robust Deep Learning with Active Noise Cancellation for Spatial Computingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

11 papers.