mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Which Direction to Choose? An Analysis on the Representation Power of Self-Supervised ViTs in Downstream Tasks

arXiv 2509.15272 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) for Vision Transformers (ViTs) has recently demonstrated considerable potential as a pre-training strategy for a variety of computer vision tasks, including image classification and segmentation, both in standard and few-shot downstream contexts. Two pre-training objectives dominate the landscape of SSL techniques: Contrastive Learning and Masked Image Modeling. Features (or tokens) extracted from the final transformer attention block -- specifically, the keys, queries, and values -- as well as features obtained after the final block's feed-forward layer, have become a common foundation for addressing downstream tasks. However, in many existing approaches, these pre-trained ViT features are further processed through additional transformation layers, often involving lightweight heads or combined with distillation, to achieve superior task performance. Although such methods can improve task outcomes, to the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive analysis of the intrinsic representation capabilities of unaltered ViT features has yet to be conducted. This study aims to bridge this gap by systematically evaluating the use of these unmodified features across image classification and segmentation tasks, in both standard and few-shot contexts. The classification and segmentation rules that we use are either hyperplane based (as in logistic regression) or cosine-similarity based, both of which rely on the presence of interpretable directions in the ViT's latent space. Based on the previous rules and without the use of additional feature transformations, we conduct an analysis across token types, tasks, and pre-trained ViT models. This study provides insights into the optimal choice for token type and decision rule based on the task, context, and the pre-training objective, while reporting detailed findings on two widely-used datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.

Builds on

45 of 53 references.

References · 45

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  8. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  9. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
  10. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  11. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  12. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
33 more
  1. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  2. 2024Depth Anything: Unleashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Datacited by 1,360
  3. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  4. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,153
  5. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
  6. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 766
  7. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  8. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  9. 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 654
  10. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  11. 2022Image as a Foreign Language: BEiT Pretraining for All Vision and Vision-Language Taskscited by 511
  12. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  13. 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 330
  14. 2022BEiT v2: Masked Image Modeling with Vector-Quantized Visual Tokenizerscited by 303
  15. 2022Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Distilling Feature Correspondencescited by 241
  16. 2014Detect What You Can: Detecting and Representing Objects using Holistic Models and Body Partscited by 232
  17. 2021Localizing Objects with Self-Supervised Transformers and no Labelscited by 230
  18. 2023EfficientSAM: Leveraged Masked Image Pretraining for Efficient Segment Anythingcited by 188
  19. 2023Cut and Learn for Unsupervised Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 187
  20. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
  21. 2022Self-Supervised Transformers for Unsupervised Object Discovery using Normalized Cutcited by 167
  22. 2023ONE-PEACE: Exploring One General Representation Model Toward Unlimited Modalitiescited by 118
  23. 2021A Survey of Visual Transformerscited by 117
  24. 2023What Do Self-Supervised Vision Transformers Learn?cited by 93
  25. 2024Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discoverycited by 91
  26. 2022Self Pre-training with Masked Autoencoders for Medical Image Classification and Segmentationcited by 69
  27. 2022A simple, efficient and scalable contrastive masked autoencoder for learning visual representationscited by 25
  28. 2023Distilling Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Weakly-Supervised Few-Shot Classification & Segmentationcited by 24
  29. 2023Multi-modal Facial Affective Analysis based on Masked Autoencodercited by 23
  30. 2024Exploring Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Analysiscited by 15
  31. 2023Understanding Masked Autoencoders From a Local Contrastive Perspectivecited by 10
  32. 2023Analyzing Local Representations of Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 8
  33. 2023Unsupervised Interpretable Basis Extraction for Concept-Based Visual Explanationscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.