Analyzing Local Representations of Self-supervised Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of various self-supervised Vision Transformers (ViTs), focusing on their local representative power. Inspired by large language models, we examine the abilities of ViTs to perform various computer vision tasks with little to no fine-tuning. We design evaluation framework to analyze the quality of local, i.e. patch-level, representations in the context of few-shot semantic segmentation, instance identification, object retrieval and tracking. We discover that contrastive learning based methods like DINO produce more universal patch representations that can be immediately applied for downstream tasks with no parameter tuning, compared to masked image modeling. The embeddings learned using the latter approach, e.g. in masked autoencoders, have high variance features that harm distance-based algorithms, such as k-NN, and do not contain useful information for most downstream tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that removing these high-variance features enhances k-NN for MAE, as well as for its recent extension Scale-MAE. Finally, we find an object instance retrieval setting where DINOv2, a model pretrained on two orders of magnitude more data, falls short of its less compute intensive counterpart DINO.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2023.
Builds on
33 of 35 references.
References · 33
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
21 more
- 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,338
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,147
- 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,062
- 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 891
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 374
- 2022Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 302
- 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 250
- 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
- 2023Scaling Autoregressive Multi-Modal Models: Pretraining and Instruction Tuningcited by 168
- 2021FAIR1M: A Benchmark Dataset for Fine-grained Object Recognition in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagerycited by 143
- 2023Towards Geospatial Foundation Models via Continual Pretrainingcited by 109
- 2023The unreasonable effectiveness of few-shot learning for machine translationcited by 91
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Vision Transformers Learn?cited by 90
- 2020Usable Information and Evolution of Optimal Representations During Trainingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2024DODA: Adapting Object Detectors to Dynamic Agricultural Environments in Real-Time with Diffusioncited by 4
- 2025SHRUG-FM: Reliability-Aware Foundation Models for Earth Observationcited by 2
- 2026MUFASA: A Multi-Layer Framework for Slot Attentioncited by 1
- 2025Which Direction to Choose? An Analysis on the Representation Power of Self-Supervised ViTs in Downstream Taskscited by 0
- 2025Do Satellite Tasks Need Special Pretraining?cited by 0
- 2026Suppressing Non-Semantic Noise in Masked Image Modeling Representationscited by 0
- 2026Metonymy in vision models undermines attention-based interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2026Latent-Action-Guided Video-Language Feature Learning for Surgical Instrument-Tissue Interaction Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Latent-Action-Guided Video-Language Feature Learning for Surgical Instrument-Tissue Interaction Recognition22 Jul 2026
- 2026Metonymy in vision models undermines attention-based interpretability7 May 2026
- 2026Suppressing Non-Semantic Noise in Masked Image Modeling Representations31 Mar 2026
- 2026MUFASA: A Multi-Layer Framework for Slot Attention7 Feb 2026
- 2025SHRUG-FM: Reliability-Aware Foundation Models for Earth Observation13 Nov 2025
- 2025Do Satellite Tasks Need Special Pretraining?19 Oct 2025
- 2025Which Direction to Choose? An Analysis on the Representation Power of Self-Supervised ViTs in Downstream Tasks18 Sep 2025
- 2024DODA: Adapting Object Detectors to Dynamic Agricultural Environments in Real-Time with Diffusion27 Mar 2024