Comparative Analysis of Tokenization Algorithms for Low-Resource Language Dzongkha
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are gaining popularity and improving rapidly. Tokenizers are crucial components of natural language processing, especially for LLMs. Tokenizers break down input text into tokens that models can easily process while ensuring the text is accurately represented, capturing its meaning and structure. Effective tokenizers enhance the capabilities of LLMs by improving a model's understanding of context and semantics, ultimately leading to better performance in various downstream tasks, such as translation, classification, sentiment analysis, and text generation. Most pre-trained tokenizers are suitable for high-resource languages like English but perform poorly for low-resource languages. Dzongkha, Bhutan's national language spoken by around seven hundred thousand people, is a low-resource language, and its linguistic complexity poses unique NLP challenges. Despite some progress, significant research in Dzongkha NLP is lacking, particularly in tokenization. This study evaluates the training and performance of three common tokenization algorithms in comparison to other popular methods. Specifically, Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE), WordPiece, and SentencePiece (Unigram) were evaluated for their suitability for Dzongkha. Performance was assessed using metrics like Subword Fertility, Proportion of Continued Words, Normalized Sequence Length, and execution time. The results show that while all three algorithms demonstrate potential, SentencePiece is the most effective for Dzongkha tokenization, paving the way for further NLP advancements. This underscores the need for tailored approaches for low-resource languages and ongoing research. In this study, we presented three tokenization algorithms for Dzongkha, paving the way for building Dzongkha Large Language Models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.
Builds on
11 of 20 references.
References · 11
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
- 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 318
- 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 192
- 2023Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?cited by 108
- 2024Getting the most out of your tokenizer for pre-training and domain adaptationcited by 66
- 2024Evaluating Tokenizer Performance of Large Language Models Across Official Indian Languagescited by 11
- 2024Problematic Tokens: Tokenizer Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.