Evaluating Large Language Models for Financial Reasoning: A CFA-Based Benchmark Study
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of large language models presents significant opportunities for financial applications, yet systematic evaluation in specialized financial contexts remains limited. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs using 1,560 multiple-choice questions from official mock exams across Levels I-III of CFA, most rigorous professional certifications globally that mirror real-world financial analysis complexity. We compare models distinguished by core design priorities: multi-modal and computationally powerful, reasoning-specialized and highly accurate, and lightweight efficiency-optimized. We assess models under zero-shot prompting and through a novel Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline that integrates official CFA curriculum content. The RAG system achieves precise domain-specific knowledge retrieval through hierarchical knowledge organization and structured query generation, significantly enhancing reasoning accuracy in professional financial certification evaluation. Results reveal that reasoning-oriented models consistently outperform others in zero-shot settings, while the RAG pipeline provides substantial improvements particularly for complex scenarios. Comprehensive error analysis identifies knowledge gaps as the primary failure mode, with minimal impact from text readability. These findings provide actionable insights for LLM deployment in finance, offering practitioners evidence-based guidance for model selection and cost-performance optimization.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2025.
Builds on
4 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 3
- 2024MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extractioncited by 255
- 2023Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Taskscited by 59
- 2023Can GPT models be Financial Analysts? An Evaluation of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on mock CFA Examscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Advanced Financial Reasoning at Scale: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on CFA Level III
- 2023Beyond Classification: Financial Reasoning in State-of-the-Art Language Models
- 2023BizBench: A Quantitative Reasoning Benchmark for Business and Finance
- 2025FinEval-KR: A Financial Domain Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models' Knowledge and Reasoning
- 2026Are the Financial Reasoning from LLMs Credible? A Real World Test over Long-Horizon Statements
- 2025Integrating Domain Knowledge for Financial QA: A Multi-Retriever RAG Approach with LLMs
- 2026FIRE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Financial Intelligence and Reasoning Evaluation
- 2025XFinBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Complex Financial Problem Solving and Reasoning