Controllable Pareto Trade-off between Fairness and Accuracy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The fairness-accuracy trade-off is a key challenge in NLP tasks. Current work focuses on finding a single "optimal" solution to balance the two objectives, which is limited considering the diverse solutions on the Pareto front. This work intends to provide controllable trade-offs according to the user's preference of the two objectives, which is defined as a reference vector. To achieve this goal, we apply multi-objective optimization (MOO), which can find solutions from various regions of the Pareto front. However, it is challenging to precisely control the trade-off due to the stochasticity of the training process and the high dimentional gradient vectors. Thus, we propose Controllable Pareto Trade-off (CPT) that can effectively train models to perform different trade-offs according to users' preferences. CPT 1) stabilizes the fairness update with a moving average of stochastic gradients to determine the update direction, and 2) prunes the gradients by only keeping the gradients of the critical parameters. We evaluate CPT on hate speech detection and occupation classification tasks. Experiments show that CPT can achieve a higher-quality set of solutions on the Pareto front than the baseline methods. It also exhibits better controllability and can precisely follow the human-defined reference vectors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.
Builds on
43 of 72 references.
References · 43
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
31 more
- 2021Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challengescited by 202
- 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 199
- 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
- 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2020Learning the Pareto Front with Hypernetworkscited by 125
- 2022Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 125
- 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
- 2024Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 58
- 2018Fairness Through Computationally-Bounded Awarenesscited by 55
- 2022Entropy-based Attention Regularization Frees Unintended Bias Mitigation from Listscited by 55
- 2022Mitigating Gender Bias in Distilled Language Models via Counterfactual Role Reversalcited by 40
- 2020Accuracy and Fairness Trade-offs in Machine Learning: A Stochastic Multi-Objective Approachcited by 39
- 2023Direction-oriented Multi-objective Learning: Simple and Provable Stochastic Algorithmscited by 34
- 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
- 2019Stable and Fair Classificationcited by 25
- 2018Taking Advantage of Multitask Learning for Fair Classificationcited by 24
- 2022Men Also Do Laundry: Multi-Attribute Bias Amplificationcited by 21
- 2019Multi-Gradient Descent for Multi-Objective Recommender Systemscited by 20
- 2022Does Your Model Classify Entities Reasonably? Diagnosing and Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Entity Typingcited by 16
- 2023Unraveling Downstream Gender Bias from Large Language Models: A Study on AI Educational Writing Assistancecited by 15
- 2025AI Sees Your Location, But With A Bias Toward The Wealthy Worldcited by 14
- 2024LibMOON: A Gradient-based MultiObjective OptimizatioN Library in PyTorchcited by 10
- 2021Multi-objective Optimization by Learning Space Partitionscited by 8
- 2022Towards Equal Opportunity Fairness through Adversarial Learningcited by 8
- 2022Learning to Teach Fairness-aware Deep Multi-task Learningcited by 8
- 2023On the Interplay between Fairness and Explainabilitycited by 7
- 2022Toward Understanding Bias Correlations for Mitigation in NLPcited by 5
- 2023A Theoretical Approach to Characterize the Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off Pareto Frontiercited by 4
- 2024Efficient Fairness-Performance Pareto Front Computationcited by 3
- 2022Properties of Group Fairness Metrics for Rankingscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.