DoubleAgents: Human-Agent Alignment in a Socially Embedded Workflow
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Aligning agentic AI with user intent is critical for delegating complex, socially embedded tasks, yet user preferences are often implicit, evolving, and difficult to specify upfront. We present DoubleAgents, a system for human-agent alignment in coordination tasks, grounded in distributed cognition. DoubleAgents integrates three components: (1) a coordination agent that maintains state and proposes plans and actions, (2) a dashboard visualization that makes the agent's reasoning legible for user evaluation, and (3) a policy module that transforms user edits into reusable alignment artifacts, including coordination policies, email templates, and stop hooks, which improve system behavior over time. We evaluate DoubleAgents through a two-day in-lab interactive simulation study (n=10), three real-world deployments, and a technical evaluation. Participants' comfort in offloading tasks and reliance on DoubleAgents both increased over time, correlating with the three distributed cognition components. Participants still required control at points of uncertainty - edge-case flagging and context-dependent actions. We contribute a distributed cognition approach to human-agent alignment in socially embedded tasks. We further introduce interactive simulation as a methodological testbed for rapid iteration and alignment testing of agentic systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 28 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.
Builds on
28 of 54 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily Assistant3 Feb
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
- 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents2 Feb
- 2023SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents18 Oct
Other references · 24
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 515
- 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 401
- 2022Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systemscited by 301
- 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 144
- 2024NATURAL PLAN: Benchmarking LLMs on Natural Language Planningcited by 128
- 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Inputcited by 123
- 2023The Programmer's Assistant: Conversational Interaction with a Large Language Model for Software Developmentcited by 96
- 2024Aligning LLM Agents by Learning Latent Preference from User Editscited by 69
12 more
- 2025Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systemscited by 68
- 2024Evaluating Cultural and Social Awareness of LLM Web Agentscited by 45
- 2023Blind Judgement: Agent-Based Supreme Court Modelling With GPTcited by 38
- 2024Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 35
- 2023ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principlescited by 33
- 2023Interactive AI Alignment: Specification, Process, and Evaluation Alignmentcited by 22
- 2025Simulating Cooperative Prosocial Behavior with Multi-Agent LLMs: Evidence and Mechanisms for AI Agents to Inform Policy Decisionscited by 20
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignmentcited by 18
- 2024Not Just Novelty: A Longitudinal Study on Utility and Customization of an AI Workflowcited by 14
- 2025Building Safe GenAI Applications: An End-to-End Overview of Red Teaming for Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2025Not Like Us, Hunty: Measuring Perceptions and Behavioral Effects of Minoritized Anthropomorphic Cues in LLMscited by 9
- 2025Towards Aligning Personalized Conversational Recommendation Agents with Users' Privacy Preferencescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Coming Crisis of Multi-Agent Misalignment: AI Alignment Must Be a Dynamic and Social Process
- 2026Socially Grounded Agentic AI: Coordinating Plural Perspectives through Social Theory
- 2026SPEAR: Five Principles for Interactive Human-Agent Alignment
- 2026Align AI to Dynamic Human-AI Workflows
- 2026The Organizational Behavior of Agentic AI: Collective Intelligence in Human-Agent Workflows
- 2026Toward Human-Centered Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Cognition, Culture, Values, and Cooperation in AI Agents
- 2026An Agent Model Abstraction for Human-AI Teaming Cognitive Coupling
- 2024Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration