Misalignment of Semantic Relation Knowledge between WordNet and Human Intuition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
WordNet provides a carefully constructed repository of semantic relations, created by specialists. But there is another source of information on semantic relations, the intuition of language users. We present the first systematic study of the degree to which these two sources are aligned. Investigating the cases of misalignment could make proper use of WordNet and facilitate its improvement. Our analysis which uses templates to elicit responses from human participants, reveals a general misalignment of semantic relation knowledge between WordNet and human intuition. Further analyses find a systematic pattern of mismatch among synonymy and taxonomic relations~(hypernymy and hyponymy), together with the fact that WordNet path length does not serve as a reliable indicator of human intuition regarding hypernymy or hyponymy relations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2024.
Builds on
8 of 32 references.
References · 8
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2018Hearst Patterns Revisited: Automatic Hypernym Detection from Large Text Corporacited by 26
- 2016HyperLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Graded Lexical Entailmentcited by 25
- 2022The Analysis of Synonymy and Antonymy in Discourse Relations: An interpretable Modeling Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025On the Distinctive Co-occurrence Characteristics of Antonymy15 Sep 2025