mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Linear Mode Connectivity of Mixture-of-Experts Architectures

arXiv 2509.11348 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2025cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions

Abstract (arXiv)

Linear Mode Connectivity (LMC) is a notable phenomenon in the loss landscapes of neural networks, wherein independently trained models have been observed to be connected--up to permutation symmetries--by linear paths in parameter space along which the loss remains consistently low. This observation challenges classical views of non-convex optimization and has implications for model ensembling, generalization, and our understanding of neural loss geometry. Inspired by recent studies on LMC in standard neural networks, we systematically investigate this phenomenon within Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures--a class of models known for their scalability and computational efficiency, which combine traditional neural networks--referred to as experts--through a learnable gating mechanism. We begin by conducting a comprehensive analysis of both dense and sparse gating regimes, demonstrating that the symmetries inherent to MoE architectures are fully characterized by permutations acting on both the expert components and the gating function. Building on these foundational findings, we propose a matching algorithm that enables alignment between independently trained MoEs, thereby facilitating the discovery of LMC. Finally, we empirically validate the presence of LMC using our proposed algorithm across diverse MoE configurations--including dense, sparse, and shared-expert variants--under a wide range of model settings and datasets of varying scales and modalities. Our results confirm the existence of LMC in MoE architectures and offer fundamental insights into the functional landscape and optimization dynamics of deep learning models.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 34 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2025.

Builds on

34 of 94 references.

References · 34

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  5. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  6. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
  7. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  8. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  9. 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,093
  10. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  11. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
  12. 2022Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetriescited by 460
22 more
  1. 2013One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modelingcited by 302
  2. 2021The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networkscited by 285
  3. 2017Empirical Analysis of the Hessian of Over-Parametrized Neural Networkscited by 283
  4. 2019Model Fusion via Optimal Transportcited by 217
  5. 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
  6. 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
  7. 2018Towards Understanding the Role of Over-Parametrization in Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 140
  8. 2020Bridging Mode Connectivity in Loss Landscapes and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 130
  9. 2016Topology and Geometry of Half-Rectified Network Optimizationcited by 102
  10. 2019Weight-space symmetry in deep networks gives rise to permutation saddles, connected by equal-loss valleys across the loss landscapecited by 61
  11. 2022Linear Connectivity Reveals Generalization Strategiescited by 55
  12. 2023Going Beyond Linear Mode Connectivity: The Layerwise Linear Feature Connectivitycited by 50
  13. 2021Analyzing Monotonic Linear Interpolation in Neural Network Loss Landscapescited by 27
  14. 2024Equivariant Neural Functional Networks for Transformerscited by 20
  15. 2018Using Mode Connectivity for Loss Landscape Analysiscited by 19
  16. 2022Wasserstein Barycenter-based Model Fusion and Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networkscited by 14
  17. 2024Accelerating Training with Neuron Interaction and Nowcasting Networkscited by 12
  18. 2024Equivariant Polynomial Functional Networkscited by 10
  19. 2024Simultaneous linear connectivity of neural networks modulo permutationcited by 9
  20. 2023A Compact Representation for Bayesian Neural Networks By Removing Permutation Symmetrycited by 6
  21. 2024Do Deep Neural Network Solutions Form a Star Domain?cited by 6
  22. 2024A Clifford Algebraic Approach to E(n)-Equivariant High-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Empirical Impact of Reducing Symmetries on the Performance of Deep Ensembles and MoE
  2. 2026Towards a Statistical Understanding of Mixture-of-Experts
  3. 2026L2R: Low-Rank and Lipschitz-Controlled Routing for Mixture-of-Experts
  4. 2025On the Expressive Power of Mixture-of-Experts for Structured Complex Tasks
  5. 2026Optimal Expert-Attention Allocation in Mixture-of-Experts: A Scalable Law for Dynamic Model Design
  6. 2025Beyond Benchmarks: Understanding Mixture-of-Experts Models through Internal Mechanisms
  7. 2026Generalization and Scaling Laws for Mixture-of-Experts Transformers
  8. 2024MoDE: A Mixture-of-Experts Model with Mutual Distillation among the Experts