mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do Deep Neural Network Solutions Form a Star Domain?

arXiv 2403.07968 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It has recently been conjectured that neural network solution sets reachable via stochastic gradient descent (SGD) are convex, considering permutation invariances (Entezari et al., 2022). This means that a linear path can connect two independent solutions with low loss, given the weights of one of the models are appropriately permuted. However, current methods to test this theory often require very wide networks to succeed. In this work, we conjecture that more generally, the SGD solution set is a "star domain" that contains a "star model" that is linearly connected to all the other solutions via paths with low loss values, modulo permutations. We propose the Starlight algorithm that finds a star model of a given learning task. We validate our claim by showing that this star model is linearly connected with other independently found solutions. As an additional benefit of our study, we demonstrate better uncertainty estimates on the Bayesian Model Averaging over the obtained star domain. Further, we demonstrate star models as potential substitutes for model ensembles. Our code is available at https://github.com/aktsonthalia/starlight.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2024.

Builds on

29 of 39 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  7. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  8. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
  9. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  10. 2020Federated Learning with Matched Averagingcited by 564
  11. 2022Git Re-Basin: Merging Models modulo Permutation Symmetriescited by 460
  12. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
17 more
  1. 2021The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networkscited by 285
  2. 2019Model Fusion via Optimal Transportcited by 217
  3. 2020Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learningcited by 144
  4. 2020Bridging Mode Connectivity in Loss Landscapes and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 130
  5. 2021Loss Surface Simplexes for Mode Connecting Volumes and Fast Ensemblingcited by 75
  6. 2019Explaining Landscape Connectivity of Low-cost Solutions for Multilayer Netscited by 63
  7. 2019Weight-space symmetry in deep networks gives rise to permutation saddles, connected by equal-loss valleys across the loss landscapecited by 61
  8. 2022Re-basin via implicit Sinkhorn differentiationcited by 61
  9. 2022Linear Connectivity Reveals Generalization Strategiescited by 55
  10. 2022Mechanistic Mode Connectivitycited by 50
  11. 2023FFCV: Accelerating Training by Removing Data Bottleneckscited by 49
  12. 2023Proving Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networks via Optimal Transportcited by 24
  13. 2022Random initialisations performing above chance and how to find themcited by 23
  14. 2018Using Mode Connectivity for Loss Landscape Analysiscited by 19
  15. 2023The star-shaped space of solutions of the spherical negative perceptroncited by 8
  16. 2023Disentangling Linear Mode-Connectivitycited by 8
  17. 2023A Compact Representation for Bayesian Neural Networks By Removing Permutation Symmetrycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.