mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differentially-private text generation degrades output language quality

arXiv 2509.11176 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring user privacy by synthesizing data from large language models (LLMs) tuned under differential privacy (DP) has become popular recently. However, the impact of DP fine-tuned LLMs on the quality of the language and the utility of the texts they produce has not been investigated. In this work, we tune five LLMs with three corpora under four levels of privacy and assess the length, the grammatical correctness, and the lexical diversity of the text outputs they produce. We also probe the utility of the synthetic outputs in downstream classification tasks such as book genre recognition based on book descriptions and cause of death recognition based on verbal autopsies. The results indicate that LLMs tuned under stronger privacy constrains produce texts that are shorter by at least 77 %, that are less grammatically correct by at least 9 %, and are less diverse by at least 10 % in bi-gram diversity. Furthermore, the accuracy they reach in downstream classification tasks decreases, which might be detrimental to the usefulness of the generated synthetic data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2025.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
  4. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  5. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  6. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
  7. 2022DiffuSeq: Sequence to Sequence Text Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 450
  8. 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 195
  9. 2022Synthetic Text Generation with Differential Privacy: A Simple and Practical Recipecited by 108
  10. 2023The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Textcited by 100
  11. 2022Differentially Private Language Models for Secure Data Sharingcited by 68
  12. 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
11 more
  1. 2024Standardizing the Measurement of Text Diversity: A Tool and a Comparative Analysis of Scorescited by 50
  2. 2025Shifting AI Efficiency From Model-Centric to Data-Centric Compressioncited by 29
  3. 2020Suicidal Ideation and Mental Disorder Detection with Attentive Relation Networkscited by 28
  4. 2024Private prediction for large-scale synthetic text generationcited by 24
  5. 2013New Alignment Methods for Discriminative Book Summarizationcited by 18
  6. 2016There's No Comparison: Reference-less Evaluation Metrics in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 18
  7. 2024Private Synthetic Text Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 10
  8. 2019Efficiency Metrics for Data-Driven Models: A Text Summarization Case Studycited by 4
  9. 2024Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Model Initialization and Self-Distillationcited by 3
  10. 2024De-amplifying Bias from Differential Privacy in Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 2
  11. 2024Does Differential Privacy Impact Bias in Pretrained NLP Models?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.