Adaptive Text Anonymization: Learning Privacy-Utility Trade-offs via Prompt Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anonymizing textual documents is a highly context-sensitive problem: the appropriate balance between privacy protection and utility preservation varies with the data domain, privacy objectives, and downstream application. However, existing anonymization methods rely on static, manually designed strategies that lack the flexibility to adjust to diverse requirements and often fail to generalize across domains. We introduce adaptive text anonymization, a new task formulation in which anonymization strategies are automatically adapted to specific privacy-utility requirements. We propose a framework for task-specific prompt optimization that automatically constructs anonymization instructions for language models, enabling adaptation to different privacy goals, domains, and downstream usage patterns. To evaluate our approach, we present a benchmark spanning five datasets with diverse domains, privacy constraints, and utility objectives. Across all evaluated settings, our framework consistently achieves a better privacy-utility trade-off than existing baselines, while remaining computationally efficient and effective on open-source language models, with performance comparable to larger closed-source models. Additionally, we show that our method can discover novel anonymization strategies that explore different points along the privacy-utility trade-off frontier.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 36 references.
References · 21
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 527
- 2024Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programscited by 270
- 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 94
- 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
- 2023Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Promptingcited by 63
- 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 54
- 2023Reducing Privacy Risks in Online Self-Disclosures with Language Modelscited by 47
- 2024A Synthetic Dataset for Personal Attribute Inferencecited by 35
- 2024DP-MLM: Differentially Private Text Rewriting Using Masked Language Modelscited by 24
9 more
- 2024IncogniText: Privacy-enhancing Conditional Text Anonymization via LLM-based Private Attribute Randomizationcited by 21
- 2023Privacy- and Utility-Preserving NLP with Anonymized Data: A case study of Pseudonymizationcited by 18
- 2025A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakagecited by 15
- 2021A Privacy-Preserving Approach to Extraction of Personal Information through Automatic Annotation and Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2025On the Impact of Noise in Differentially Private Text Rewritingcited by 8
- 2023Man vs the machine: The Struggle for Effective Text Anonymisation in the Age of Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025A Survey on Current Trends and Recent Advances in Text Anonymizationcited by 5
- 2025Tau-Eval: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Useful and Private Text Anonymizationcited by 4
- 2025Differentially-private text generation degrades output language qualitycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.