De-amplifying Bias from Differential Privacy in Language Model Fine-tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness and privacy are two important values machine learning (ML) practitioners often seek to operationalize in models. Fairness aims to reduce model bias for social/demographic sub-groups. Privacy via differential privacy (DP) mechanisms, on the other hand, limits the impact of any individual's training data on the resulting model. The trade-offs between privacy and fairness goals of trustworthy ML pose a challenge to those wishing to address both. We show that DP amplifies gender, racial, and religious bias when fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), producing models more biased than ones fine-tuned without DP. We find the cause of the amplification to be a disparity in convergence of gradients across sub-groups. Through the case of binary gender bias, we demonstrate that Counterfactual Data Augmentation (CDA), a known method for addressing bias, also mitigates bias amplification by DP. As a consequence, DP and CDA together can be used to fine-tune models while maintaining both fairness and privacy.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.
Builds on
24 of 32 references.
References · 24
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 541
- 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 412
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
12 more
- 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Pretrained Foundation Models: A History from BERT to ChatGPTcited by 368
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
- 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
- 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
- 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
- 2021Selective Differential Privacy for Language Modelingcited by 62
- 2019Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Datacited by 58
- 2023The Dark Side of ChatGPT: Legal and Ethical Challenges from Stochastic Parrots and Hallucinationcited by 23
- 2022Counterfactual Data Augmentation improves Factuality of Abstractive Summarizationcited by 8
- 2021An Analysis Of Protected Health Information Leakage In Deep-Learning Based De-Identification Algorithmscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025SoK: What Makes Private Learning Unfair?cited by 3
- 2025Differentially-private text generation degrades output language qualitycited by 1
- 2025Differentially-private text generation degrades output language quality14 Sep 2025
- 2025SoK: What Makes Private Learning Unfair?24 Jan 2025