AI Harmonics: a human-centric and harms severity-adaptive AI risk assessment framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The absolute dominance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) introduces unprecedented societal harms and risks. Existing AI risk assessment models focus on internal compliance, often neglecting diverse stakeholder perspectives and real-world consequences. We propose a paradigm shift to a human-centric, harm-severity adaptive approach grounded in empirical incident data. We present AI Harmonics, which includes a novel AI harm assessment metric (AIH) that leverages ordinal severity data to capture relative impact without requiring precise numerical estimates. AI Harmonics combines a robust, generalized methodology with a data-driven, stakeholder-aware framework for exploring and prioritizing AI harms. Experiments on annotated incident data confirm that political and physical harms exhibit the highest concentration and thus warrant urgent mitigation: political harms erode public trust, while physical harms pose serious, even life-threatening risks, underscoring the real-world relevance of our approach. Finally, we demonstrate that AI Harmonics consistently identifies uneven harm distributions, enabling policymakers and organizations to target their mitigation efforts effectively.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.
Builds on
15 of 71 references.
References · 15
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 314
- 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
- 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
- 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 96
- 2024AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policiescited by 74
- 2023Human-AI Coevolutioncited by 27
- 2024A Collaborative, Human-Centred Taxonomy of AI, Algorithmic, and Automation Harmscited by 19
- 2024AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Securitycited by 17
- 2023Towards Concrete and Connected AI Risk Assessment (C2AIRA): A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Open Problems in AI Incident Governancecited by 1
- 2026Physiological Noise Augmentation Improves Non-Invasive Brain-to-Speechcited by 0
- 2026Measuring AI harms with multidimensional Lorenz Zonoidscited by 0
- 2026Measuring AI harms with multidimensional Lorenz Zonoids29 Jul 2026
- 2026Physiological Noise Augmentation Improves Non-Invasive Brain-to-Speech6 Jul 2026
- 2026Open Problems in AI Incident Governance6 Jul 2026