Intolerable Risk Threshold Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Frontier AI models -- highly capable foundation models at the cutting edge of AI development -- may pose severe risks to public safety, human rights, economic stability, and societal value in the coming years. These risks could arise from deliberate adversarial misuse, system failures, unintended cascading effects, or simultaneous failures across multiple models. In response to such risks, at the AI Seoul Summit in May 2024, 16 global AI industry organizations signed the Frontier AI Safety Commitments, and 27 nations and the EU issued a declaration on their intent to define these thresholds. To fulfill these commitments, organizations must determine and disclose ``thresholds at which severe risks posed by a model or system, unless adequately mitigated, would be deemed intolerable.'' To assist in setting and operationalizing intolerable risk thresholds, we outline key principles and considerations; for example, to aim for ``good, not perfect'' thresholds in the face of limited data on rapidly advancing AI capabilities and consequently evolving risks. We also propose specific threshold recommendations, including some detailed case studies, for a subset of risks across eight risk categories: (1) Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Weapons, (2) Cyber Attacks, (3) Model Autonomy, (4) Persuasion and Manipulation, (5) Deception, (6) Toxicity, (7) Discrimination, and (8) Socioeconomic Disruption. Our goal is to serve as a starting point or supplementary resource for policymakers and industry leaders, encouraging proactive risk management that prioritizes preventing intolerable risks (ex ante) rather than merely mitigating them after they occur (ex post).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025AI Harmonics: a human-centric and harms severity-adaptive AI risk assessment frameworkcited by 3
- 2025Technical Requirements for Halting Dangerous AI Activitiescited by 2
- 2025The 2025 OpenAI Preparedness Framework does not guarantee any AI risk mitigation practices: a proof-of-concept for affordance analyses of AI safety policiescited by 2
- 2025The 2025 OpenAI Preparedness Framework does not guarantee any AI risk mitigation practices: a proof-of-concept for affordance analyses of AI safety policies29 Sep 2025
- 2025AI Harmonics: a human-centric and harms severity-adaptive AI risk assessment framework12 Sep 2025
- 2025Technical Requirements for Halting Dangerous AI Activities13 Jul 2025