mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Collaborative, Human-Centred Taxonomy of AI, Algorithmic, and Automation Harms

arXiv 2407.01294 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a collaborative, human-centred taxonomy of AI, algorithmic and automation harms. We argue that existing taxonomies, while valuable, can be narrow, unclear, typically cater to practitioners and government, and often overlook the needs of the wider public. Drawing on existing taxonomies and a large repository of documented incidents, we propose a taxonomy that is clear and understandable to a broad set of audiences, as well as being flexible, extensible, and interoperable. Through iterative refinement with topic experts and crowdsourced annotation testing, we propose a taxonomy that can serve as a powerful tool for civil society organisations, educators, policymakers, product teams and the general public. By fostering a greater understanding of the real-world harms of AI and related technologies, we aim to increase understanding, empower NGOs and individuals to identify and report violations, inform policy discussions, and encourage responsible technology development and deployment.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.

Builds on

9 of 52 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
  2. 2022Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reductioncited by 137
  3. 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 95
  4. 2022The Fallacy of AI Functionalitycited by 88
  5. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68
  6. 2020The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco, Big Tech, and the threat on academic integritycited by 38
  7. 2022From plane crashes to algorithmic harm: applicability of safety engineering frameworks for responsible MLcited by 26
  8. 2023TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AIcited by 25
  9. 2023Risk assessment at AGI companies: A review of popular risk assessment techniques from other safety-critical industriescited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 10; 2026: 7.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Reality Check: A New Evaluation Ecosystem Is Necessary to Understand AI's Real World Effectscited by 18
  2. 2024Plurals: A System for Guiding LLMs Via Simulated Social Ensemblescited by 17
  3. 2025Taxonomizing Representational Harms using Speech Act Theorycited by 7
  4. 2025Harmful Traits of AI Companionscited by 6
  5. 2025The Backfiring Effect of Weak AI Safety Regulationcited by 3
  6. 2025AI Harmonics: a human-centric and harms severity-adaptive AI risk assessment frameworkcited by 2
  7. 2026Agent-Supported Foresight for AI Systemic Risks: AI Agents for Breadth, Experts for Judgmentcited by 2
  8. 2025Fairness in Federated Learning: Fairness for Whom?cited by 1
  9. 2025ECHO: A Participatory Framework for Bias-Anchored AI Harm Anticipationcited by 1
  10. 2026What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safetycited by 1
  11. 2026When AI Fails, What Works? A Data-Driven Taxonomy of Real-World AI Risk Mitigation Strategiescited by 1
  12. 2026Food Noise & False Safety: A Systematic Evaluation of How LLMs Fail to Adapt to Eating Disorder Queries with Clinician Feedbackcited by 1
7 more
  1. 2024Standardization Trends on Safety and Trustworthiness Technology for Advanced AIcited by 0
  2. 2025Who is Responsible When AI Fails? Mapping Causes, Entities, and Consequences of AI Privacy and Ethical Incidentscited by 0
  3. 2025FAIRTOPIA: Envisioning Multi-Agent Guardianship for Disrupting Unfair AI Pipelinescited by 0
  4. 2025Dimensional Characterization and Pathway Modeling for Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 0
  5. 2026Human-Guided Harm Recovery for Computer Use Agentscited by 0
  6. 2026FLARE-AI: Flaw Reporting for AIcited by 0
  7. 2026The safety failures we are not instrumenting: a perspective on hidden safety-critical challenges in modern AI systemscited by 0