mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Role-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Financial Education Question Answering with LLMs

arXiv 2509.09727 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.CEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Question answering (QA) plays a central role in financial education, yet existing large language model (LLM) approaches often fail to capture the nuanced and specialized reasoning required for financial problem-solving. The financial domain demands multistep quantitative reasoning, familiarity with domain-specific terminology, and comprehension of real-world scenarios. We present a multi-agent framework that leverages role-based prompting to enhance performance on domain-specific QA. Our framework comprises a Base Generator, an Evidence Retriever, and an Expert Reviewer agent that work in a single-pass iteration to produce a refined answer. We evaluated our framework on a set of 3,532 expert-designed finance education questions from Study.com, an online learning platform. We leverage retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for contextual evidence from 6 finance textbooks and prompting strategies for a domain-expert reviewer. Our experiments indicate that critique-based refinement improves answer accuracy by 6.6-8.3% over zero-shot Chain-of-Thought baselines, with the highest performance from Gemini-2.0-Flash. Furthermore, our method enables GPT-4o-mini to achieve performance comparable to the finance-tuned FinGPT-mt_Llama3-8B_LoRA. Our results show a cost-effective approach to enhancing financial QA and offer insights for further research in multi-agent financial LLM systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.

Builds on

12 of 27 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
  3. 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 552
  4. 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Promptingcited by 220
  5. 2023ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Expertscited by 140
  6. 2025Voting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debatecited by 55
  7. 2023When "A Helpful Assistant" Is Not Really Helpful: Personas in System Prompts Do Not Improve Performances of Large Language Modelscited by 50
  8. 2024Anchoring Bias in Large Language Models: An Experimental Studycited by 37
  9. 2024Persona is a Double-edged Sword: Mitigating the Negative Impact of Role-playing Prompts in Zero-shot Reasoning Taskscited by 28
  10. 2025FinSage: A Multi-aspect RAG System for Financial Filings Question Answeringcited by 18
  11. 2024SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QAcited by 17
  12. 2025Exploring the Impact of Occupational Personas on Domain-Specific QAcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Enhancing Financial Question Answering with a Multi-Agent Reflection Framework
  2. 2026Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Financial Document Question Answering
  3. 2025Integrating Domain Knowledge for Financial QA: A Multi-Retriever RAG Approach with LLMs
  4. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models for Financial Reasoning: A CFA-Based Benchmark Study
  5. 2024Fine-tuning Smaller Language Models for Question Answering over Financial Documents
  6. 2026CIFQA: A Deterministic Tool-Grounded Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Financial Query Answering
  7. 2025Improved LLM Agents for Financial Document Question Answering
  8. 2025FinAgentBench: A Benchmark Dataset for Agentic Retrieval in Financial Question Answering