Continuous-Time Value Iteration for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing reinforcement learning (RL) methods struggle with complex dynamical systems that demand interactions at high frequencies or irregular time intervals. Continuous-time RL (CTRL) has emerged as a promising alternative by replacing discrete-time Bellman recursion with differential value functions defined as viscosity solutions of the Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB) equation. While CTRL has shown promise, its applications have been largely limited to the single-agent domain. This limitation stems from two key challenges: (i) conventional solution methods for HJB equations suffer from the curse of dimensionality (CoD), making them intractable in high-dimensional systems; and (ii) even with HJB-based learning approaches, accurately approximating centralized value functions in multi-agent settings remains difficult, which in turn destabilizes policy training. In this paper, we propose a CT-MARL framework that uses physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to approximate HJB-based value functions at scale. To ensure the value is consistent with its differential structure, we align value learning with value-gradient learning by introducing a Value Gradient Iteration (VGI) module that iteratively refines value gradients along trajectories. This improves gradient fidelity, in turn yielding more accurate values and stronger policy learning. We evaluate our method using continuous-time variants of standard benchmarks, including multi-agent particle environment (MPE) and multi-agent MuJoCo. Our results demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing continuous-time RL baselines and scales to complex multi-agent dynamics.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2025.
Builds on
32 of 58 references.
References · 32
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,264
- 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 721
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
- 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Ataricited by 502
- 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 371
- 2020FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradientscited by 178
- 2021Policy Gradient and Actor-Critic Learning in Continuous Time and Space: Theory and Algorithmscited by 101
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Surveycited by 98
20 more
- 2020DeepReach: A Deep Learning Approach to High-Dimensional Reachabilitycited by 91
- 2022q-Learning in Continuous Timecited by 91
- 2021Policy Evaluation and Temporal-Difference Learning in Continuous Time and Space: A Martingale Approachcited by 84
- 2020Algorithms for Solving High Dimensional PDEs: From Nonlinear Monte Carlo to Machine Learningcited by 77
- 2020Single and Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for AI-Enabled Wireless Networks: A Tutorialcited by 60
- 2019Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretizationcited by 58
- 2018Convergence of the Deep BSDE Method for Coupled FBSDEscited by 43
- 2021Continuous-Time Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
- 2019Adaptive Deep Learning for High-Dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equationscited by 40
- 2021Time Discretization-Invariant Safe Action Repetition for Policy Gradient Methodscited by 23
- 2024Physics-Informed Neural Network Policy Iteration: Algorithms, Convergence, and Verificationcited by 13
- 2022Distributional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equations for Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2022OptimizedDP: An Efficient, User-friendly Library For Optimal Control and Dynamic Programmingcited by 11
- 2024Continuous-Time State Estimation Methods in Robotics: A Surveycited by 10
- 2023Bridging Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Reinforcement Learning: Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Proximal Policy Optimization (HJBPPO)cited by 7
- 2024A Pontryagin Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2023AC2C: Adaptively Controlled Two-Hop Communication for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2023Value Approximation for Two-Player General-Sum Differential Games with State Constraintscited by 3
- 2024Pontryagin Neural Operator for Solving Parametric General-Sum Differential Gamescited by 3
- 2024An Idiosyncrasy of Time-discretization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Mixed Q-Functionals: Advancing Value-Based Methods in Cooperative MARL with Continuous Action Domains
- 2025Deterministic Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning with Continuous Time and State
- 2026Operator-Guided Invariance Learning for Continuous Reinforcement Learning
- 2025A Temporal Difference Method for Stochastic Continuous Dynamics
- 2026Unifying Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability and Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Beyond Monotonicity: Revisiting Factorization Principles in Multi-Agent Q-Learning
- 2025Is Bellman Equation Enough for Learning Control?
- 2024Value-Based Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Sparse Training