An Idiosyncrasy of Time-discretization in Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many reinforcement learning algorithms are built on an assumption that an agent interacts with an environment over fixed-duration, discrete time steps. However, physical systems are continuous in time, requiring a choice of time-discretization granularity when digitally controlling them. Furthermore, such systems do not wait for decisions to be made before advancing the environment state, necessitating the study of how the choice of discretization may affect a reinforcement learning algorithm. In this work, we consider the relationship between the definitions of the continuous-time and discrete-time returns. Specifically, we acknowledge an idiosyncrasy with naively applying a discrete-time algorithm to a discretized continuous-time environment, and note how a simple modification can better align the return definitions. This observation is of practical consideration when dealing with environments where time-discretization granularity is a choice, or situations where such granularity is inherently stochastic.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.
Builds on
9 of 31 references.
References · 9
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
- 2018Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Real-World Robotscited by 64
- 2019Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretizationcited by 51
- 2016Unifying task specification in reinforcement learningcited by 41
- 2018Setting up a Reinforcement Learning Task with a Real-World Robotcited by 32
- 2022Dynamic Decision Frequency with Continuous Optionscited by 11
- 2023Reducing the Cost of Cycle-Time Tuning for Real-World Policy Optimizationcited by 4
- 2022Managing Temporal Resolution in Continuous Value Estimation: A Fundamental Trade-offcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.