Triadic Fusion of Cognitive, Functional, and Causal Dimensions for Explainable LLMs: The TAXAL Framework
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed in high-risk domains where opacity, bias, and instability undermine trust and accountability. Traditional explainability methods, focused on surface outputs, do not capture the reasoning pathways, planning logic, and systemic impacts of agentic LLMs. We introduce TAXAL (Triadic Alignment for eXplainability in Agentic LLMs), a triadic fusion framework that unites three complementary dimensions: cognitive (user understanding), functional (practical utility), and causal (faithful reasoning). TAXAL provides a unified, role-sensitive foundation for designing, evaluating, and deploying explanations in diverse sociotechnical settings. Our analysis synthesizes existing methods, ranging from post-hoc attribution and dialogic interfaces to explanation-aware prompting, and situates them within the TAXAL triadic fusion model. We further demonstrate its applicability through case studies in law, education, healthcare, and public services, showing how explanation strategies adapt to institutional constraints and stakeholder roles. By combining conceptual clarity with design patterns and deployment pathways, TAXAL advances explainability as a technical and sociotechnical practice, supporting trustworthy and context-sensitive LLM applications in the era of agentic AI.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 18
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
- 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 118
- 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 66
- 2024From Understanding to Utilization: A Survey on Explainability for Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2024JAILJUDGE: A Comprehensive Jailbreak Judge Benchmark with Multi-Agent Enhanced Explanation Evaluation Frameworkcited by 47
- 2024Usable XAI: 10 Strategies Towards Exploiting Explainability in the LLM Eracited by 46
- 2025Is Conversational XAI All You Need? Human-AI Decision Making With a Conversational XAI Assistantcited by 26
- 2024XAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2024XAI for All: Can Large Language Models Simplify Explainable AI?cited by 21
- 2025An overview of model uncertainty and variability in LLM-based sentiment analysis. Challenges, mitigation strategies and the role of explainabilitycited by 15
6 more
- 2025Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language modelscited by 12
- 2024Editing Factual Knowledge and Explanatory Ability of Medical Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025A Unified Framework with Novel Metrics for Evaluating the Effectiveness of XAI Techniques in LLMscited by 7
- 2024The Effect of Model Size on LLM Post-hoc Explainability via LIMEcited by 4
- 2025Making Sense of the Unsensible: Reflection, Survey, and Challenges for XAI in Large Language Models Toward Human-Centered AIcited by 3
- 2025Opacity as a Feature, Not a Flaw: The LoBOX Governance Ethic for Role-Sensitive Explainability and Institutional Trust in AIcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Thoughts without Thinking: Reconsidering the Explanatory Value of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs through Agentic Pipelines
- 2026Project Ariadne: A Structural Causal Framework for Auditing Faithfulness in LLM Agents
- 2026TriEx: A Game-based Tri-View Framework for Explaining Internal Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs
- 2024Can LLMs faithfully generate their layperson-understandable 'self'?: A Case Study in High-Stakes Domains
- 2026From Plausible to Actionable: A Position on LLM Self-Explanations
- 2025Layered Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Comprehensive Approach to Explainable Large Language Models
- 2025Because we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretability
- 2026Causally Grounded Mechanistic Interpretability for LLMs with Faithful Natural-Language Explanations