Cloning a Conversational Voice AI Agent from Call,Recording Datasets for Telesales
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in language and speech modelling have made it possible to build autonomous voice assistants that understand and generate human dialogue in real time. These systems are increasingly being deployed in domains such as customer service and healthcare care, where they can automate repetitive tasks, reduce operational costs, and provide constant support around the clock. In this paper, we present a general methodology for cloning a conversational voice AI agent from a corpus of call recordings. Although the case study described in this paper uses telesales data to illustrate the approach, the underlying process generalizes to any domain where call transcripts are available. Our system listens to customers over the telephone, responds with a synthetic voice, and follows a structured playbook learned from top performing human agents. We describe the domain selection, knowledge extraction, and prompt engineering used to construct the agent, integrating automatic speech recognition, a large language model based dialogue manager, and text to speech synthesis into a streaming inference pipeline. The cloned agent is evaluated against human agents on a rubric of 22 criteria covering introduction, product communication, sales drive, objection handling, and closing. Blind tests show that the AI agent approaches human performance in routine aspects of the call while underperforming in persuasion and objection handling. We analyze these shortcomings and refine the prompt accordingly. The paper concludes with design lessons and avenues for future research, including large scale simulation and automated evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.
Builds on
9 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 8
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizerscited by 737
- 2018Towards end-to-end spoken language understandingcited by 92
- 2023SLM: Bridge the thin gap between speech and text foundation modelscited by 67
- 2025Future of Work with AI Agents: Auditing Automation and Augmentation Potential across the U.S. Workforcecited by 33
- 2022Efficient Customer Service Combining Human Operators and Virtual Agentscited by 1
- 2025Customer Service Representative's Perception of the AI Assistant in an Organization's Call Centercited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DuplexWorld: Can voice agents help you get through the day?
- 2025Thinking While Speaking: Inference-Time Knowledge Transfer for Responsive and Intelligent Conversational Voice Agents
- 2025VoiceAgentBench: Are Voice Assistants ready for agentic tasks?
- 2023Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems
- 2026Talk2Agent: Benchmarking Voice Interfaces for Text Agents
- 2025Spoken Conversational Agents with Large Language Models
- 2026SpeechGym: An Audio-Native Gym for Training Voice Agents via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025VoiceAssistant-Eval: Benchmarking AI Assistants across Listening, Speaking, and Viewing