mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AMBEDKAR-A Multi-level Bias Elimination through a Decoding Approach with Knowledge Augmentation for Robust Constitutional Alignment of Language Models

arXiv 2509.02133 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2025cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) can inadvertently reflect societal biases present in their training data, leading to harmful or prejudiced outputs. In the Indian context, our empirical evaluations across a suite of models reveal that biases around caste and religion are particularly salient. Yet, most existing mitigation strategies are Western-centric and fail to address these local nuances. We propose AMBEDKAR, a framework inspired by the egalitarian vision of Dr B. R. Ambedkar, architect of the Indian Constitution, to guide LLM outputs toward fairness, neutrality, and inclusion in line with Articles 14 to 17. Our approach introduces a Constitution-Aware Decoding Layer, guided by the AI Constitution of India and applied only at inference time, without any parameter updates to the base model. We incorporate a speculative decoding algorithm that proactively reduces casteist and communal bias during generation. This mitigation layer operates directly within the decoding process, avoiding changes to model internals and lowering the computational and infrastructural costs associated with retraining. We reinterpret speculative decoding not merely as an efficiency tool but as a mechanism for fairness. In this framework, a Small Language Model (SLM) acts as a potentially biased generator, while a constitutionally guided Large Language Model (LLM) serves as the verifier. Rather than accelerating generation, the LLM enforces bias-robust trajectories in the SLM outputs. This inversion of roles gives rise to a fairness-by-speculation paradigm. Our approach yields an absolute reduction of bias up to 26.41 percent compared to baseline. Our source code, datasets, and results are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AMBEDKAR-983B/

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 40 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.

Builds on

40 of 66 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback15 Dec

Other references · 39

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  6. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  7. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  8. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
  9. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  10. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  11. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 1,006
  12. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
27 more
  1. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  2. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  4. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  5. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  6. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  7. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
  8. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  9. 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 441
  10. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
  11. 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
  12. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
  13. 2022COLD Decoding: Energy-based Constrained Text Generation with Langevin Dynamicscited by 161
  14. 2019Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluationcited by 148
  15. 2019FairFace: Face Attribute Dataset for Balanced Race, Gender, and Agecited by 87
  16. 2024Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 77
  17. 2024Self-Debiasing Large Language Models: Zero-Shot Recognition and Reduction of Stereotypescited by 59
  18. 2024FairMT-Bench: Benchmarking Fairness for Multi-turn Dialogue in Conversational LLMscited by 36
  19. 2024Airavata: Introducing Hindi Instruction-tuned LLMcited by 32
  20. 2024Speculative Decoding via Early-exiting for Faster LLM Inference with Thompson Sampling Control Mechanismcited by 32
  21. 2024Large Language Models are Biased Because They Are Large Language Modelscited by 26
  22. 2023GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 16
  23. 2023Co2PT: Mitigating Bias in Pre-trained Language Models through Counterfactual Contrastive Prompt Tuningcited by 15
  24. 2025DECASTE: Unveiling Caste Stereotypes in Large Language Models through Multi-Dimensional Bias Analysiscited by 12
  25. 2024SUTRA: Scalable Multilingual Language Model Architecturecited by 11
  26. 2021Evaluating Metrics for Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 7
  27. 2018Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Models (Extended Abstract)cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Steering Towards Fairness: Mitigating Political Bias in LLMs
  2. 2024Towards Resource Efficient and Interpretable Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models
  3. 2025Decoding Human Preferences in Alignment: An Improved Approach to Inverse Constitutional AI
  4. 2026Mind the Gap: Pitfalls of LLM Alignment with Asian Public Opinion
  5. 2024Collective Constitutional AI: Aligning a Language Model with Public Input
  6. 2025Data and AI governance: Promoting equity, ethics, and fairness in large language models
  7. 2026COFT: Counterfactual-Conformal Decoding for Fair Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
  8. 2024A Multi-LLM Debiasing Framework