Entropy-Based Non-Invasive Reliability Monitoring of Convolutional Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have become the foundation of modern computer vision, achieving unprecedented accuracy across diverse image recognition tasks. While these networks excel on in-distribution data, they remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations imperceptible input modifications that cause misclassification with high confidence. However, existing detection methods either require expensive retraining, modify network architecture, or degrade performance on clean inputs. Here we show that adversarial perturbations create immediate, detectable entropy signatures in CNN activations that can be monitored without any model modification. Using parallel entropy monitoring on VGG-16, we demonstrate that adversarial inputs consistently shift activation entropy by 7% in early convolutional layers, enabling 90% detection accuracy with false positives and false negative rates below 20%. The complete separation between clean and adversarial entropy distributions reveals that CNNs inherently encode distribution shifts in their activation patterns. This work establishes that CNN reliability can be assessed through activation entropy alone, enabling practical deployment of self-diagnostic vision systems that detect adversarial inputs in real-time without compromising original model performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2025.
Builds on
21 of 28 references.
References · 21
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
9 more
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 245
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2020The Information Bottleneck Problem and Its Applications in Machine Learningcited by 66
- 2022Benchmarking Bayesian Deep Learning on Diabetic Retinopathy Detection Taskscited by 49
- 2018Scalable Mutual Information Estimation using Dependence Graphscited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.