mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Does Cognitive Bias Affect Large Language Models? A Case Study on the Anchoring Effect in Price Negotiation Simulations

arXiv 2508.21137 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cognitive biases, well-studied in humans, can also be observed in LLMs, affecting their reliability in real-world applications. This paper investigates the anchoring effect in LLM-driven price negotiations. To this end, we instructed seller LLM agents to apply the anchoring effect and evaluated negotiations using not only an objective metric but also a subjective metric. Experimental results show that LLMs are influenced by the anchoring effect like humans. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between the anchoring effect and factors such as reasoning and personality. It was shown that reasoning models are less prone to the anchoring effect, suggesting that the long chain of thought mitigates the effect. However, we found no significant correlation between personality traits and susceptibility to the anchoring effect. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of cognitive biases in LLMs and to the realization of safe and responsible application of LLMs in society.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
  3. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 752
  4. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 658
  5. 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 515
  6. 2023Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playingcited by 339
  7. 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 234
  8. 2018Decoupling Strategy and Generation in Negotiation Dialoguescited by 162
  9. 2024Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMscited by 106
  10. 2024How Well Can LLMs Negotiate? NegotiationArena Platform and Analysiscited by 100
  11. 2024Can Large Language Model Agents Simulate Human Trust Behavior?cited by 64
  12. 2020Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 59
5 more
  1. 2024Measuring Bargaining Abilities of LLMs: A Benchmark and A Buyer-Enhancement Methodcited by 48
  2. 2023Do Large Language Models Show Decision Heuristics Similar to Humans? A Case Study Using GPT-3.5cited by 42
  3. 2024Anchoring Bias in Large Language Models: An Experimental Studycited by 37
  4. 2024LLMs Simulate Big Five Personality Traits: Further Evidencecited by 22
  5. 2024Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models: A Survey and Mitigation Experimentscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Anchors in the Machine: Behavioral and Attributional Evidence of Anchoring Bias in LLMs
  2. 2025Understanding the Anchoring Effect of LLM with Synthetic Data: Existence, Mechanism, and Potential Mitigations
  3. 2024CBEval: A framework for evaluating and interpreting cognitive biases in LLMs
  4. 2026Do LLMs Choose Like Humans? Using Cognitive Theory to Evaluate LLM Decision-Making
  5. 2025AIM-Bench: Evaluating Decision-making Biases of Agentic LLM as Inventory Manager
  6. 2025The Illusion of Rationality: Tacit Bias and Strategic Dominance in Frontier LLM Negotiation Games
  7. 2023Negotiating with LLMS: Prompt Hacks, Skill Gaps, and Reasoning Deficits
  8. 2026Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs