mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FLAegis: A Two-Layer Defense Framework for Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks

arXiv 2508.18737 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) has become a powerful technique for training Machine Learning (ML) models in a decentralized manner, preserving the privacy of the training datasets involved. However, the decentralized nature of FL limits the visibility of the training process, relying heavily on the honesty of participating clients. This assumption opens the door to malicious third parties, known as Byzantine clients, which can poison the training process by submitting false model updates. Such malicious clients may engage in poisoning attacks, manipulating either the dataset or the model parameters to induce misclassification. In response, this study introduces FLAegis, a two-stage defensive framework designed to identify Byzantine clients and improve the robustness of FL systems. Our approach leverages symbolic time series transformation (SAX) to amplify the differences between benign and malicious models, and spectral clustering, which enables accurate detection of adversarial behavior. Furthermore, we incorporate a robust FFT-based aggregation function as a final layer to mitigate the impact of those Byzantine clients that manage to evade prior defenses. We rigorously evaluate our method against five poisoning attacks, ranging from simple label flipping to adaptive optimization-based strategies. Notably, our approach outperforms state-of-the-art defenses in both detection precision and final model accuracy, maintaining consistently high performance even under strong adversarial conditions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.

Builds on

19 of 50 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
  3. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 765
  4. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  5. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  6. 2020Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Frameworkcited by 455
  7. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
  8. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  9. 2020Threats to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 178
  10. 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 161
  11. 2020Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketingcited by 128
  12. 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 125
7 more
  1. 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 118
  2. 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 88
  3. 2022LoMar: A Local Defense Against Poisoning Attack on Federated Learningcited by 31
  4. 2021Byzantine-robust Federated Learning through Collaborative Malicious Gradient Filteringcited by 30
  5. 2022Shielding Federated Learning: Robust Aggregation with Adaptive Client Selectioncited by 18
  6. 2023Sentinel: An Aggregation Function to Secure Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 4
  7. 2024FedRDF: A Robust and Dynamic Aggregation Function against Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.