mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Shielding Federated Learning: Robust Aggregation with Adaptive Client Selection

arXiv 2204.13256 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2022cs.CR cs.DCcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train an accurate global model while protecting clients' data privacy. However, FL is susceptible to Byzantine attacks from malicious participants. Although the problem has gained significant attention, existing defenses have several flaws: the server irrationally chooses malicious clients for aggregation even after they have been detected in previous rounds; the defenses perform ineffectively against sybil attacks or in the heterogeneous data setting. To overcome these issues, we propose MAB-RFL, a new method for robust aggregation in FL. By modelling the client selection as an extended multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem, we propose an adaptive client selection strategy to choose honest clients that are more likely to contribute high-quality updates. We then propose two approaches to identify malicious updates from sybil and non-sybil attacks, based on which rewards for each client selection decision can be accurately evaluated to discourage malicious behaviors. MAB-RFL achieves a satisfying balance between exploration and exploitation on the potential benign clients. Extensive experimental results show that MAB-RFL outperforms existing defenses in three attack scenarios under different percentages of attackers.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 7; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Over-The-Air Federated Learning: Status Quo, Open Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 21
  2. 2023Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Data via Gradient Splittingcited by 13
  3. 2023FLrce: Resource-Efficient Federated Learning with Early-Stopping Strategycited by 10
  4. 2023Denial-of-Service or Fine-Grained Control: Towards Flexible Model Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learningcited by 9
  5. 2025MARS: A Malignity-Aware Backdoor Defense in Federated Learningcited by 7
  6. 2022Federated Multi-Armed Bandits Under Byzantine Attackscited by 6
  7. 2024Influence-Oriented Personalized Federated Learningcited by 6
  8. 2023A Systematic Literature Review on Client Selection in Federated Learningcited by 3
  9. 2023MISA: Unveiling the Vulnerabilities in Split Federated Learningcited by 3
  10. 2024Understanding Byzantine Robustness in Federated Learning with A Black-box Servercited by 1
  11. 2024Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning: An Overview With Focus on Developing Sybil-based Attacks to Backdoor Augmented Secure Aggregation Protocolscited by 1
  12. 2025FLAegis: A Two-Layer Defense Framework for Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attackscited by 1
6 more
  1. 2023A Unified Momentum-based Paradigm of Decentralized SGD for Non-Convex Models and Heterogeneous Datacited by 0
  2. 2024Fed-Credit: Robust Federated Learning with Credibility Managementcited by 0
  3. 2024SHFL: Secure Hierarchical Federated Learning Framework for Edge Networkscited by 0
  4. 2024FRIDA: Free-Rider Detection using Privacy Attackscited by 0
  5. 2025EBS-CFL: Efficient and Byzantine-robust Secure Clustered Federated Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026Upholding Robustness in Federated Learning: Trends, Emerging Strategies, and Research Opportunitiescited by 0