mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FedGreed: A Byzantine-Robust Loss-Based Aggregation Method for Federated Learning

arXiv 2508.18060 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across multiple clients while preserving data privacy by keeping local datasets on-device. In this work, we address FL settings where clients may behave adversarially, exhibiting Byzantine attacks, while the central server is trusted and equipped with a reference dataset. We propose FedGreed, a resilient aggregation strategy for federated learning that does not require any assumptions about the fraction of adversarial participants. FedGreed orders clients' local model updates based on their loss metrics evaluated against a trusted dataset on the server and greedily selects a subset of clients whose models exhibit the minimal evaluation loss. Unlike many existing approaches, our method is designed to operate reliably under heterogeneous (non-IID) data distributions, which are prevalent in real-world deployments. FedGreed exhibits convergence guarantees and bounded optimality gaps under strong adversarial behavior. Experimental evaluations on MNIST, FMNIST, and CIFAR-10 demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms standard and robust federated learning baselines, such as Mean, Trimmed Mean, Median, Krum, and Multi-Krum, in the majority of adversarial scenarios considered, including label flipping and Gaussian noise injection attacks. All experiments were conducted using the Flower federated learning framework.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  4. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
  5. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  6. 2020Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learningcited by 682
  7. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
  8. 2020Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Frameworkcited by 455
  9. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
  10. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  11. 2019Fall of Empires: Breaking Byzantine-tolerant SGD by Inner Product Manipulationcited by 141
  12. 2020Multi-Task Federated Learning for Personalised Deep Neural Networks in Edge Computingcited by 52
6 more
  1. 2021FedCor: Correlation-Based Active Client Selection Strategy for Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 43
  2. 2023An Experimental Study of Byzantine-Robust Aggregation Schemes in Federated Learningcited by 32
  3. 2024Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning: Impact of Client Subsampling and Local Updatescited by 14
  4. 2023Federated Learning with Extremely Noisy Clients via Negative Distillationcited by 12
  5. 2021Byzantine-robust Federated Learning through Spatial-temporal Analysis of Local Model Updatescited by 8
  6. 2025Robust Federated Learning under Adversarial Attacks via Loss-Based Client Clusteringcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.