Understanding Subword Compositionality of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) take sequences of subwords as input, requiring them to effective compose subword representations into meaningful word-level representations. In this paper, we present a comprehensive set of experiments to probe how LLMs compose subword information, focusing on three key aspects: structural similarity, semantic decomposability, and form retention. Our analysis of the experiments suggests that these five LLM families can be classified into three distinct groups, likely reflecting difference in their underlying composition strategies. Specifically, we observe (i) three distinct patterns in the evolution of structural similarity between subword compositions and whole-word representations across layers; (ii) great performance when probing layer by layer their sensitivity to semantic decompositionality; and (iii) three distinct patterns when probing sensitivity to formal features, e.g., character sequence length. These findings provide valuable insights into the compositional dynamics of LLMs and highlight different compositional pattens in how LLMs encode and integrate subword information.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.
Builds on
28 of 42 references.
References · 28
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
- 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 503
- 2024StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generationcited by 502
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2024Aya Expanse: Combining Research Breakthroughs for a New Multilingual Frontiercited by 129
- 2019Neural Machine Translation with Byte-Level Subwordscited by 115
- 2024Understanding and Patching Compositional Reasoning in LLMscited by 46
16 more
- 2024Fast Vocabulary Transfer for Language Model Compressioncited by 42
- 2020Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformerscited by 41
- 2018Evaluating Compositionality in Sentence Embeddingscited by 35
- 2024Tokenization Matters! Degrading Large Language Models through Challenging Their Tokenizationcited by 32
- 2020Spying on your neighbors: Fine-grained probing of contextual embeddings for information about surrounding wordscited by 28
- 2024Can LLMs Reason with Rules? Logic Scaffolding for Stress-Testing and Improving LLMscited by 28
- 2023Do Vision and Language Models Share Concepts? A Vector Space Alignment Studycited by 27
- 2018Assessing Composition in Sentence Vector Representationscited by 26
- 2022The SIGMORPHON 2022 Shared Task on Morpheme Segmentationcited by 25
- 2023Unnatural Error Correction: GPT-4 Can Almost Perfectly Handle Unnatural Scrambled Textcited by 19
- 2024PIXAR: Auto-Regressive Language Modeling in Pixel Spacecited by 16
- 2024Concept Space Alignment in Multilingual LLMscited by 13
- 2024Autoregressive Pre-Training on Pixels and Textscited by 10
- 2024On the Tip of the Tongue: Analyzing Conceptual Representation in Large Language Models with Reverse-Dictionary Probecited by 6
- 2016Geometry of Compositionalitycited by 4
- 2021Representing Syntax and Composition with Geometric Transformationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.