mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Tip of the Tongue: Analyzing Conceptual Representation in Large Language Models with Reverse-Dictionary Probe

arXiv 2402.14404 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Probing and enhancing large language models' reasoning capacity remains a crucial open question. Here we re-purpose the reverse dictionary task as a case study to probe LLMs' capacity for conceptual inference. We use in-context learning to guide the models to generate the term for an object concept implied in a linguistic description. Models robustly achieve high accuracy in this task, and their representation space encodes information about object categories and fine-grained features. Further experiments suggest that the conceptual inference ability as probed by the reverse-dictionary task predicts model's general reasoning performance across multiple benchmarks, despite similar syntactic generalization behaviors across models. Explorative analyses suggest that prompting LLMs with descriptionRightarrowword examples may induce generalization beyond surface-level differences in task construals and facilitate models on broader commonsense reasoning problems.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 41 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

41 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Tasks5 Jul
  2. 2023Turning large language models into cognitive models6 Jun
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models27 Feb
  4. 2022Thinking Fast and Slow in Large Language Models10 Dec
  5. 2022Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning tasks14 Jul
  6. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?25 Feb

Other references · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  4. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  5. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  6. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  7. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  8. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  9. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  10. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  11. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  12. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
23 more
  1. 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 763
  2. 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
  3. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  4. 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
  5. 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 458
  6. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 431
  7. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
  8. 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 280
  9. 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 209
  10. 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 180
  11. 2023Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solvecited by 178
  12. 2020A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 165
  13. 2019Do Neural Language Representations Learn Physical Commonsense?cited by 62
  14. 2020ProtoQA: A Question Answering Dataset for Prototypical Common-Sense Reasoningcited by 46
  15. 2015Learning to Understand Phrases by Embedding the Dictionarycited by 33
  16. 2019Cracking the Contextual Commonsense Code: Understanding Commonsense Reasoning Aptitude of Deep Contextual Representationscited by 24
  17. 2022Unit Testing for Concepts in Neural Networkscited by 23
  18. 2019Revealing interpretable object representations from human behaviorcited by 17
  19. 2019Multi-channel Reverse Dictionary Modelcited by 16
  20. 2020BERT for Monolingual and Cross-Lingual Reverse Dictionarycited by 12
  21. 2022Semantic features of object concepts generated with GPT-3cited by 12
  22. 2019Polysemy and brevity versus frequency in languagecited by 8
  23. 2023Causal interventions expose implicit situation models for commonsense language understandingcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models
  2. 2024Exploring Concept Depth: How Large Language Models Acquire Knowledge and Concept at Different Layers?
  3. 2023Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than Symbolic Reasoners
  4. 2025Demystifying the Roles of LLM Layers in Retrieval, Knowledge, and Reasoning
  5. 2026RecaLLM: Addressing the Lost-in-Thought Phenomenon with Explicit In-Context Retrieval
  6. 2025Decoding Knowledge in Large Language Models: A Framework for Categorization and Comprehension
  7. 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches
  8. 2024Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models