mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Few-shot Class-incremental Fault Diagnosis by Preserving Class-Agnostic Knowledge with Dual-Granularity Representations

arXiv 2508.16634 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Few-Shot Class-Incremental Fault Diagnosis (FSC-FD), which aims to continuously learn from new fault classes with only a few samples without forgetting old ones, is critical for real-world industrial systems. However, this challenging task severely amplifies the issues of catastrophic forgetting of old knowledge and overfitting on scarce new data. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel framework built upon Dual-Granularity Representations, termed the Dual-Granularity Guidance Network (DGGN). Our DGGN explicitly decouples feature learning into two parallel streams: 1) a fine-grained representation stream, which utilizes a novel Multi-Order Interaction Aggregation module to capture discriminative, class-specific features from the limited new samples. 2) a coarse-grained representation stream, designed to model and preserve general, class-agnostic knowledge shared across all fault types. These two representations are dynamically fused by a multi-semantic cross-attention mechanism, where the stable coarse-grained knowledge guides the learning of fine-grained features, preventing overfitting and alleviating feature conflicts. To further mitigate catastrophic forgetting, we design a Boundary-Aware Exemplar Prioritization strategy. Moreover, a decoupled Balanced Random Forest classifier is employed to counter the decision boundary bias caused by data imbalance. Extensive experiments on the TEP benchmark and a real-world MFF dataset demonstrate that our proposed DGGN achieves superior diagnostic performance and stability compared to state-of-the-art FSC-FD approaches. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/MentaY/DGGN

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2025.

Builds on

22 of 50 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  5. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  7. 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
  8. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  9. 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 732
  10. 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 597
  11. 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 371
  12. 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
10 more
  1. 2021Self-Supervised Models are Continual Learnerscited by 149
  2. 2018Rotate your Networks: Better Weight Consolidation and Less Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 127
  3. 2020Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspacescited by 99
  4. 2023Learning with Fantasy: Semantic-Aware Virtual Contrastive Constraint for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learningcited by 55
  5. 2020Learning Adaptive Embedding Considering Incremental Classcited by 21
  6. 2022Multi-Granularity Regularized Re-Balancing for Class Incremental Learningcited by 8
  7. 2023SCLIFD:Supervised Contrastive Knowledge Distillation for Incremental Fault Diagnosis under Limited Fault Datacited by 5
  8. 2023An Order-Invariant and Interpretable Hierarchical Dilated Convolution Neural Network for Chemical Fault Detection and Diagnosiscited by 4
  9. 2023Hard Sample Mining Enabled Supervised Contrastive Feature Learning for Wind Turbine Pitch System Fault Diagnosiscited by 1
  10. 2023Generalized Out-of-distribution Fault Diagnosis (GOOFD) via Internal Contrastive Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.