An Order-Invariant and Interpretable Hierarchical Dilated Convolution Neural Network for Chemical Fault Detection and Diagnosis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fault detection and diagnosis is significant for reducing maintenance costs and improving health and safety in chemical processes. Convolution neural network (CNN) is a popular deep learning algorithm with many successful applications in chemical fault detection and diagnosis tasks. However, convolution layers in CNN are very sensitive to the order of features, which can lead to instability in the processing of tabular data. Optimal order of features result in better performance of CNN models but it is expensive to seek such optimal order. In addition, because of the encapsulation mechanism of feature extraction, most CNN models are opaque and have poor interpretability, thus failing to identify root-cause features without human supervision. These difficulties inevitably limit the performance and credibility of CNN methods. In this paper, we propose an order-invariant and interpretable hierarchical dilated convolution neural network (HDLCNN), which is composed by feature clustering, dilated convolution and the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method. The novelty of HDLCNN lies in its capability of processing tabular data with features of arbitrary order without seeking the optimal order, due to the ability to agglomerate correlated features of feature clustering and the large receptive field of dilated convolution. Then, the proposed method provides interpretability by including the SHAP values to quantify feature contribution. Therefore, the root-cause features can be identified as the features with the highest contribution. Computational experiments are conducted on the Tennessee Eastman chemical process benchmark dataset. Compared with the other methods, the proposed HDLCNN-SHAP method achieves better performance on processing tabular data with features of arbitrary order, detecting faults, and identifying the root-cause features.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2023.
Builds on
6 of 53 references.
References · 6
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017Dilated Residual Networkscited by 294
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025ImputeINR: Time Series Imputation via Implicit Neural Representations for Disease Diagnosis with Missing Datacited by 3
- 2023Generalized Out-of-distribution Fault Diagnosis (GOOFD) via Internal Contrastive Learningcited by 1
- 2025Class Incremental Fault Diagnosis under Limited Fault Data via Supervised Contrastive Knowledge Distillationcited by 1
- 2025Few-shot Class-incremental Fault Diagnosis by Preserving Class-Agnostic Knowledge with Dual-Granularity Representationscited by 0
- 2025Few-shot Class-incremental Fault Diagnosis by Preserving Class-Agnostic Knowledge with Dual-Granularity Representations16 Aug 2025
- 2025ImputeINR: Time Series Imputation via Implicit Neural Representations for Disease Diagnosis with Missing Data16 May 2025
- 2025Class Incremental Fault Diagnosis under Limited Fault Data via Supervised Contrastive Knowledge Distillation16 Jan 2025
- 2023Generalized Out-of-distribution Fault Diagnosis (GOOFD) via Internal Contrastive Learning27 Jun 2023