mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graph RAG as Human Choice Model: Building a Data-Driven Mobility Agent with Preference Chain

arXiv 2508.16172 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2025cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding human behavior in urban environments is a crucial field within city sciences. However, collecting accurate behavioral data, particularly in newly developed areas, poses significant challenges. Recent advances in generative agents, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), have shown promise in simulating human behaviors without relying on extensive datasets. Nevertheless, these methods often struggle with generating consistent, context-sensitive, and realistic behavioral outputs. To address these limitations, this paper introduces the Preference Chain, a novel method that integrates Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with LLMs to enhance context-aware simulation of human behavior in transportation systems. Experiments conducted on the Replica dataset demonstrate that the Preference Chain outperforms standard LLM in aligning with real-world transportation mode choices. The development of the Mobility Agent highlights potential applications of proposed method in urban mobility modeling for emerging cities, personalized travel behavior analysis, and dynamic traffic forecasting. Despite limitations such as slow inference and the risk of hallucination, the method offers a promising framework for simulating complex human behavior in data-scarce environments, where traditional data-driven models struggle due to limited data availability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2025.

Builds on

12 of 35 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  6. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  7. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
  8. 2024GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 550
  9. 2018T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic Predictioncited by 401
  10. 2020A Survey on Deep Learning for Human Mobilitycited by 88
  11. 2024On the limits of agency in agent-based modelscited by 21
  12. 2025Consistency in Language Models: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026GTA: Generative Traffic Agents for Simulating Realistic Mobility Behavior
  2. 2025Modeling realistic human behavior using generative agents in a multimodal transport system: Software architecture and Application to Toulouse
  3. 2025MobileCity: An Efficient Framework for Large-Scale Urban Behavior Simulation
  4. 2024GenAI-powered Multi-Agent Paradigm for Smart Urban Mobility: Opportunities and Challenges for Integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Intelligent Transportation Systems
  5. 2025GATSim: Urban Mobility Simulation with Generative Agents
  6. 2026CityReal: Human-Aligned Urban Behavior and City Dynamics Simulation with Large-Scale LLM Agents
  7. 2025LLM-ABM for Transportation: Assessing the Potential of LLM Agents in System Analysis
  8. 2025TrajLLM: A Modular LLM-Enhanced Agent-Based Framework for Realistic Human Trajectory Simulation