GPLight+: A Genetic Programming Method for Learning Symmetric Traffic Signal Control Policy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, learning-based approaches, have achieved significant success in automatically devising effective traffic signal control strategies. In particular, as a powerful evolutionary machine learning approach, Genetic Programming (GP) is utilized to evolve human-understandable phase urgency functions to measure the urgency of activating a green light for a specific phase. However, current GP-based methods are unable to treat the common traffic features of different traffic signal phases consistently. To address this issue, we propose to use a symmetric phase urgency function to calculate the phase urgency for a specific phase based on the current road conditions. This is represented as an aggregation of two shared subtrees, each representing the urgency of a turn movement in the phase. We then propose a GP method to evolve the symmetric phase urgency function. We evaluate our proposed method on the well-known cityflow traffic simulator, based on multiple public real-world datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed symmetric urgency function representation can significantly improve the performance of the learned traffic signal control policies over the traditional GP representation on a wide range of scenarios. Further analysis shows that the proposed method can evolve effective, human-understandable and easily deployable traffic signal control policies.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2025.
Builds on
15 of 65 references.
References · 15
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2017Evolution Strategies as a Scalable Alternative to Reinforcement Learningcited by 574
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 261
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 249
- 2019CoLight: Learning Network-level Cooperation for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 138
- 2019CityFlow: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Environment for Large Scale City Traffic Scenariocited by 115
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Surveycited by 98
- 2019Learning Phase Competition for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 87
- 2019Diagnosing Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 33
- 2021Expression might be enough: representing pressure and demand for reinforcement learning based traffic signal controlcited by 29
- 2021Efficient Pressure: Improving efficiency for signalized intersectionscited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025SymLight: Exploring Interpretable and Deployable Symbolic Policies for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 2
- 2025Evolutionary Discovery of Heuristic Policies for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 1
- 2026EvoTSC: Evolving Feature Learning Models for Time Series Classification via Genetic Programmingcited by 0
- 2026EvoTSC: Evolving Feature Learning Models for Time Series Classification via Genetic Programming28 Apr 2026
- 2025Evolutionary Discovery of Heuristic Policies for Traffic Signal Control28 Nov 2025
- 2025SymLight: Exploring Interpretable and Deployable Symbolic Policies for Traffic Signal Control8 Nov 2025