Vector preference-based contextual bandits under distributional shifts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider contextual bandit learning under distribution shift when reward vectors are ordered according to a given preference cone. We propose an adaptive-discretization and optimistic elimination based policy that self-tunes to the underlying distribution shift. To measure the performance of this policy, we introduce the notion of preference-based regret which measures the performance of a policy in terms of distance between Pareto fronts. We study the performance of this policy by establishing upper bounds on its regret under various assumptions on the nature of distribution shift. Our regret bounds generalize known results for the existing case of no distribution shift and vectorial reward settings, and scale gracefully with problem parameters in presence of distribution shifts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2018Marginal Singularity, and the Benefits of Labels in Covariate-Shiftcited by 65
- 2013Bandits and Experts in Metric Spacescited by 63
- 2019Hedging the Drift: Learning to Optimize under Non-Stationaritycited by 46
- 2018Satisficing in Time-Sensitive Bandit Learningcited by 39
- 2022A new similarity measure for covariate shift with applications to nonparametric regressioncited by 33
- 2019Smooth Contextual Bandits: Bridging the Parametric and Non-differentiable Regret Regimescited by 25
- 2022Transfer Learning for Contextual Multi-armed Banditscited by 24
- 2018Multi-objective Contextual Bandit Problem with Similarity Informationcited by 21
- 2023Adaptive Algorithms for Relaxed Pareto Set Identificationcited by 15
- 2020Self-Tuning Bandits over Unknown Covariate-Shiftscited by 12
- 2023Drug Discovery under Covariate Shift with Domain-Informed Prior Distributions over Functionscited by 10
- 2021Learning Under Adversarial and Interventional Shiftscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.