Learning Under Adversarial and Interventional Shifts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models are often trained on data from one distribution and deployed on others. So it becomes important to design models that are robust to distribution shifts. Most of the existing work focuses on optimizing for either adversarial shifts or interventional shifts. Adversarial methods lack expressivity in representing plausible shifts as they consider shifts to joint distributions in the data. Interventional methods allow more expressivity but provide robustness to unbounded shifts, resulting in overly conservative models. In this work, we combine the complementary strengths of the two approaches and propose a new formulation, RISe, for designing robust models against a set of distribution shifts that are at the intersection of adversarial and interventional shifts. We employ the distributionally robust optimization framework to optimize the resulting objective in both supervised and reinforcement learning settings. Extensive experimentation with synthetic and real world datasets from healthcare demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2021.
Builds on
30 of 57 references.
References · 30
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
- 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
- 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
- 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
- 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 333
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
- 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
- 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
18 more
- 2017Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributionscited by 125
- 2018Invariance, Causality and Robustnesscited by 123
- 2018Anchor regression: heterogeneous data meets causalitycited by 116
- 2019Counterfactual Off-Policy Evaluation with Gumbel-Max Structural Causal Modelscited by 114
- 2013Data-Driven Robust Optimizationcited by 84
- 2018Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda: Counterfactually-Guided Policy Searchcited by 81
- 2019Distributionally Robust Optimization and Generalization in Kernel Methodscited by 73
- 2020A causal framework for distribution generalizationcited by 68
- 2020Off-policy Policy Evaluation For Sequential Decisions Under Unobserved Confoundingcited by 60
- 2019Beyond Confidence Regions: Tight Bayesian Ambiguity Sets for Robust MDPscited by 37
- 2020POPCORN: Partially Observed Prediction COnstrained ReiNforcement Learningcited by 36
- 2020Learning Optimal Distributionally Robust Individualized Treatment Rulescited by 28
- 2019Distributionally Robust Counterfactual Risk Minimizationcited by 26
- 2020Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for External Validity under a Covariate Shiftcited by 26
- 2020Risk Variance Penalizationcited by 21
- 2020Counterfactually Guided Off-policy Transfer in Clinical Settingscited by 13
- 2020Optimizing Medical Treatment for Sepsis in Intensive Care: from Reinforcement Learning to Pre-Trial Evaluationcited by 8
- 2020Evaluating Model Robustness and Stability to Dataset Shiftcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.