mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DAIQ: Auditing Demographic Attribute Inference from Question in LLMs

arXiv 2508.15830 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent evaluations of Large language models (LLMs) audit social bias primarily through prompts that explicitly reference demographic attributes, overlooking whether models infer sensitive demographics from neutral questions. Such inference constitutes epistemic overreach and raises concerns for privacy. We introduce Demographic Attribute Inference from Questions (DAIQ), a diagnostic audit framework for evaluating demographic inference under epistemic uncertainty. We evaluate 18 open- and closed-source LLMs across six real-world domains and five demographic attributes. We find that many models infer demographics from neutral questions, defaulting to socially dominant categories and producing stereotype-aligned rationales. These behaviors persist across model families, scales and decoding settings, indicating reliance on learned population priors. We further show that inferred demographics can condition downstream responses and that abstention oriented prompting substantially reduces unintended inference without model fine-tuning. Our results suggest that current bias evaluations are incomplete and motivate evaluation standards that assess not only how models respond to demographic information, but whether they should infer it at all.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2025.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  5. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  6. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  7. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 710
  8. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
  9. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 658
  10. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 541
  11. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
  12. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
12 more
  1. 2023Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Modelscited by 207
  2. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  3. 2023Evaluating and Mitigating Discrimination in Language Model Decisionscited by 124
  4. 2024Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 77
  5. 2022Gender Bias in Masked Language Models for Multiple Languagescited by 60
  6. 2024What's in a Name? Auditing Large Language Models for Race and Gender Biascited by 51
  7. 2023The Unequal Opportunities of Large Language Models: Revealing Demographic Bias through Job Recommendationscited by 41
  8. 2024MBBQ: A Dataset for Cross-Lingual Comparison of Stereotypes in Generative LLMscited by 35
  9. 2021Revealing Persona Biases in Dialogue Systemscited by 33
  10. 2024Unmasking and Quantifying Racial Bias of Large Language Models in Medical Report Generationcited by 31
  11. 2024The Silicon Ceiling: Auditing GPT's Race and Gender Biases in Hiringcited by 29
  12. 2025Analyzing the Safety of Japanese Large Language Models in Stereotype-Triggering Promptscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

10 papers.